President Trump’s recent public exchanges, including labeling a reporter a “dumb person” while defending White House renovation costs and coining terms like “Dumocrats” for critics, underscore his established pattern of direct, unscripted rhetoric during press interactions and on Truth Social. These developments coincide with Republican primaries and midterm preparations, where his statements often target media, opponents, or policy details. Traders assess the likelihood of future insults by tracking scheduled events such as congressional votes, international summits, and campaign stops that typically increase his visibility and spontaneous commentary. Historical records of his communications show repeated instances of pointed language, though the exact timing hinges on daily press access and emerging political pressures.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้วWill Trump publicly insult someone on...?
Will Trump publicly insult someone on...?
$505,154 ปริมาณ
May 31, 2026
May 18
94%
May 19
93%
May 20
92%
May 21
90%
May 22
93%
May 23
91%
May 24
90%
May 25
91%
May 26
91%
May 27
89%
May 28
91%
May 29
91%
May 30
91%
May 31
90%
$505,154 ปริมาณ
May 18
$6,420 ปริมาณ
94%
May 19
$1,979 ปริมาณ
93%
May 20
$1,695 ปริมาณ
92%
May 21
$656 ปริมาณ
90%
May 22
$958 ปริมาณ
93%
May 23
$147 ปริมาณ
91%
May 24
$497 ปริมาณ
90%
May 25
$626 ปริมาณ
91%
May 26
$735 ปริมาณ
91%
May 27
$1,035 ปริมาณ
89%
May 28
$523 ปริมาณ
91%
May 29
$383 ปริมาณ
91%
May 30
$97 ปริมาณ
91%
May 31
$399 ปริมาณ
90%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump’s recent public exchanges, including labeling a reporter a “dumb person” while defending White House renovation costs and coining terms like “Dumocrats” for critics, underscore his established pattern of direct, unscripted rhetoric during press interactions and on Truth Social. These developments coincide with Republican primaries and midterm preparations, where his statements often target media, opponents, or policy details. Traders assess the likelihood of future insults by tracking scheduled events such as congressional votes, international summits, and campaign stops that typically increase his visibility and spontaneous commentary. Historical records of his communications show repeated instances of pointed language, though the exact timing hinges on daily press access and emerging political pressures.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$505,154วันสิ้นสุด
May 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...เสนอผลลัพธ์แล้ว: Yes
ไม่มีการคัดค้าน
ผลลัพธ์สุดท้าย: Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump’s recent public exchanges, including labeling a reporter a “dumb person” while defending White House renovation costs and coining terms like “Dumocrats” for critics, underscore his established pattern of direct, unscripted rhetoric during press interactions and on Truth Social. These developments coincide with Republican primaries and midterm preparations, where his statements often target media, opponents, or policy details. Traders assess the likelihood of future insults by tracking scheduled events such as congressional votes, international summits, and campaign stops that typically increase his visibility and spontaneous commentary. Historical records of his communications show repeated instances of pointed language, though the exact timing hinges on daily press access and emerging political pressures.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$505,154วันสิ้นสุด
May 31, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...เสนอผลลัพธ์แล้ว: Yes
ไม่มีการคัดค้าน
ผลลัพธ์สุดท้าย: Yes
President Trump’s recent public exchanges, including labeling a reporter a “dumb person” while defending White House renovation costs and coining terms like “Dumocrats” for critics, underscore his established pattern of direct, unscripted rhetoric during press interactions and on Truth Social. These developments coincide with Republican primaries and midterm preparations, where his statements often target media, opponents, or policy details. Traders assess the likelihood of future insults by tracking scheduled events such as congressional votes, international summits, and campaign stops that typically increase his visibility and spontaneous commentary. Historical records of his communications show repeated instances of pointed language, though the exact timing hinges on daily press access and emerging political pressures.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย