President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado$799,696 Vol.
30 jun 2026
Jimmy Kimmel
41%
Megyn Kelly
36%
Nicolás Maduro
34%
Emmanuel Macron
32%
Keir Starmer
28%
Norah O'Donnell
31%
Zohran Mamdani
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
22%
Alex Jones
30%
Freidrich Merz
12%
Elon Musk
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Vladimir Putin
5%
Pam Bondi
4%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Melania Trump
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
$799,696 Vol.
Jimmy Kimmel
$41,096 Vol.
41%
Megyn Kelly
$457 Vol.
36%
Nicolás Maduro
$4,223 Vol.
34%
Emmanuel Macron
$10,115 Vol.
32%
Keir Starmer
$1,413 Vol.
28%
Norah O'Donnell
$637 Vol.
31%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,461 Vol.
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$78,968 Vol.
22%
Alex Jones
$500 Vol.
30%
Freidrich Merz
$7,916 Vol.
12%
Elon Musk
$6,720 Vol.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$5,204 Vol.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$11,561 Vol.
5%
Vladimir Putin
$11,229 Vol.
5%
Pam Bondi
$3,115 Vol.
4%
J.D. Vance
$4,335 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$47,626 Vol.
3%
Melania Trump
$6,591 Vol.
2%
Viktor Orbán
$4,796 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ET
Volumen
$799,696Fecha de finalización
30 jun 2026Mercado abierto
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$799,696Fecha de finalización
30 jun 2026Mercado abierto
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes