Trader consensus prices "No" at 99.5% on whether President Trump will insult Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman by May 15, driven by the razor-thin two-day resolution window and absence of any public statements, Truth Social posts, or interviews from Trump targeting MBS in the past week. Despite strains from Saudi Arabia's refusal to grant U.S. basing rights for operations against Iran—prompting Riyadh's support for Pakistan-brokered diplomacy—and Trump's crude March remarks at a Saudi-backed investment forum mocking MBS's deference, no escalation has occurred recently. This reflects the wisdom of crowds in a low-event period, with historical U.S.-Saudi alliance enduring. Realistic shifts could stem from an impromptu Trump address, diplomatic leak, or Iran war flare-up prompting offhand criticism before midnight May 15.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedWill Trump insult MBS by May 15?
Will Trump insult MBS by May 15?
$23,148 Vol.
$23,148 Vol.
$23,148 Vol.
$23,148 Vol.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Market Opened: May 7, 2026, 2:01 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus prices "No" at 99.5% on whether President Trump will insult Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman by May 15, driven by the razor-thin two-day resolution window and absence of any public statements, Truth Social posts, or interviews from Trump targeting MBS in the past week. Despite strains from Saudi Arabia's refusal to grant U.S. basing rights for operations against Iran—prompting Riyadh's support for Pakistan-brokered diplomacy—and Trump's crude March remarks at a Saudi-backed investment forum mocking MBS's deference, no escalation has occurred recently. This reflects the wisdom of crowds in a low-event period, with historical U.S.-Saudi alliance enduring. Realistic shifts could stem from an impromptu Trump address, diplomatic leak, or Iran war flare-up prompting offhand criticism before midnight May 15.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions