President Trump's pattern of public criticism, evident in his July 24, 2026, speech at the rescheduled White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, continues to shape trader assessments for this market. During the event, he directed remarks at journalists by name and revived longstanding nicknames for Democratic figures including former President Biden, Senate Minority Leader Schumer, and governors or lawmakers such as Newsom, Omar, Warren, and Schiff. These statements occurred amid an administration already engaged in legal and rhetorical disputes with media outlets. With roughly one month remaining until the August 31 resolution date, traders will monitor upcoming public appearances, press interactions, and social media activity for additional targeted comments, while noting that historical frequency of such exchanges can fluctuate with legislative calendars or international developments.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · DiperbaruiBARU
$11,452 Vol.
Aug 31, 2026
Joe Biden
99%
Barack Obama
96%
Tucker Carlson
81%
Nicolás Maduro
66%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
52%
Megyn Kelly
49%
Jerome Powell
45%
Jimmy Kimmel
42%
Zohran Mamdani
27%
Benjamin Netanyahu
17%
Candace Owens
17%
Vladimir Putin
25%
Kaitlan Collins
14%
Andy Burnham
11%
Emmanuel Macron
9%
Norah O'Donnell
9%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Friedrich Merz
7%
Alex Jones
7%
Elon Musk
6%
Xi Jinping
6%
Viktor Orbán
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
5%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Pam Bondi
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Melania Trump
1%
$11,452 Vol.
Joe Biden
$1,972 Vol.
99%
Barack Obama
$1,448 Vol.
96%
Tucker Carlson
$143 Vol.
81%
Nicolás Maduro
$0 Vol.
66%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$0 Vol.
52%
Megyn Kelly
$2 Vol.
49%
Jerome Powell
$20 Vol.
45%
Jimmy Kimmel
$0 Vol.
42%
Zohran Mamdani
$0 Vol.
27%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$102 Vol.
17%
Candace Owens
$5 Vol.
17%
Vladimir Putin
$26 Vol.
25%
Kaitlan Collins
$0 Vol.
14%
Andy Burnham
$802 Vol.
11%
Emmanuel Macron
$197 Vol.
9%
Norah O'Donnell
$1,039 Vol.
9%
Kevin Warsh
$0 Vol.
8%
Friedrich Merz
$522 Vol.
7%
Alex Jones
$82 Vol.
7%
Elon Musk
$523 Vol.
6%
Xi Jinping
$279 Vol.
6%
Viktor Orbán
$0 Vol.
5%
Mohammed bin Salman
$0 Vol.
5%
Pope Leo XIV
$815 Vol.
5%
Pam Bondi
$0 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$529 Vol.
3%
Melania Trump
$2,946 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's pattern of public criticism, evident in his July 24, 2026, speech at the rescheduled White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, continues to shape trader assessments for this market. During the event, he directed remarks at journalists by name and revived longstanding nicknames for Democratic figures including former President Biden, Senate Minority Leader Schumer, and governors or lawmakers such as Newsom, Omar, Warren, and Schiff. These statements occurred amid an administration already engaged in legal and rhetorical disputes with media outlets. With roughly one month remaining until the August 31 resolution date, traders will monitor upcoming public appearances, press interactions, and social media activity for additional targeted comments, while noting that historical frequency of such exchanges can fluctuate with legislative calendars or international developments.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Pasar Dibuka: Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
Volume
$11,452Tanggal Berakhir
Aug 31, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's pattern of public criticism, evident in his July 24, 2026, speech at the rescheduled White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, continues to shape trader assessments for this market. During the event, he directed remarks at journalists by name and revived longstanding nicknames for Democratic figures including former President Biden, Senate Minority Leader Schumer, and governors or lawmakers such as Newsom, Omar, Warren, and Schiff. These statements occurred amid an administration already engaged in legal and rhetorical disputes with media outlets. With roughly one month remaining until the August 31 resolution date, traders will monitor upcoming public appearances, press interactions, and social media activity for additional targeted comments, while noting that historical frequency of such exchanges can fluctuate with legislative calendars or international developments.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$11,452Tanggal Berakhir
Aug 31, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's pattern of public criticism, evident in his July 24, 2026, speech at the rescheduled White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, continues to shape trader assessments for this market. During the event, he directed remarks at journalists by name and revived longstanding nicknames for Democratic figures including former President Biden, Senate Minority Leader Schumer, and governors or lawmakers such as Newsom, Omar, Warren, and Schiff. These statements occurred amid an administration already engaged in legal and rhetorical disputes with media outlets. With roughly one month remaining until the August 31 resolution date, traders will monitor upcoming public appearances, press interactions, and social media activity for additional targeted comments, while noting that historical frequency of such exchanges can fluctuate with legislative calendars or international developments.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan