Trump’s longstanding pattern of using personal rhetoric in public statements, social media posts, and press interactions continues to drive trader expectations for daily resolution markets on whether he will insult someone. Recent developments include his introduction of the term “Dumocrats” during a Fox News appearance and pointed attacks on a reporter questioning White House renovation costs, as well as criticisms of Texas Democrat James Talarico over policy positions. These exchanges align with his approach to opponents and media figures. Scheduled events such as upcoming briefings, Truth Social activity, and political rallies within the resolution window could influence outcomes, though the high implied probabilities reflect traders’ assessment that such rhetoric remains a consistent element of his public communication style.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · DiperbaruiWill Trump publicly insult someone on...?
Will Trump publicly insult someone on...?
$484,428 Vol.
May 31, 2026
May 17
91%
May 18
90%
May 19
93%
May 20
91%
May 21
90%
May 22
94%
May 23
90%
May 24
89%
May 25
88%
May 26
88%
May 27
86%
May 28
89%
May 29
88%
May 30
91%
May 31
89%
$484,428 Vol.
May 17
$10,841 Vol.
91%
May 18
$2,804 Vol.
90%
May 19
$1,609 Vol.
93%
May 20
$1,070 Vol.
91%
May 21
$474 Vol.
90%
May 22
$907 Vol.
94%
May 23
$104 Vol.
90%
May 24
$433 Vol.
89%
May 25
$620 Vol.
88%
May 26
$692 Vol.
88%
May 27
$1,014 Vol.
86%
May 28
$501 Vol.
89%
May 29
$382 Vol.
88%
May 30
$96 Vol.
91%
May 31
$369 Vol.
89%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s longstanding pattern of using personal rhetoric in public statements, social media posts, and press interactions continues to drive trader expectations for daily resolution markets on whether he will insult someone. Recent developments include his introduction of the term “Dumocrats” during a Fox News appearance and pointed attacks on a reporter questioning White House renovation costs, as well as criticisms of Texas Democrat James Talarico over policy positions. These exchanges align with his approach to opponents and media figures. Scheduled events such as upcoming briefings, Truth Social activity, and political rallies within the resolution window could influence outcomes, though the high implied probabilities reflect traders’ assessment that such rhetoric remains a consistent element of his public communication style.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Pasar Dibuka: Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
Volume
$484,428Tanggal Berakhir
May 31, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s longstanding pattern of using personal rhetoric in public statements, social media posts, and press interactions continues to drive trader expectations for daily resolution markets on whether he will insult someone. Recent developments include his introduction of the term “Dumocrats” during a Fox News appearance and pointed attacks on a reporter questioning White House renovation costs, as well as criticisms of Texas Democrat James Talarico over policy positions. These exchanges align with his approach to opponents and media figures. Scheduled events such as upcoming briefings, Truth Social activity, and political rallies within the resolution window could influence outcomes, though the high implied probabilities reflect traders’ assessment that such rhetoric remains a consistent element of his public communication style.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$484,428Tanggal Berakhir
May 31, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump’s longstanding pattern of using personal rhetoric in public statements, social media posts, and press interactions continues to drive trader expectations for daily resolution markets on whether he will insult someone. Recent developments include his introduction of the term “Dumocrats” during a Fox News appearance and pointed attacks on a reporter questioning White House renovation costs, as well as criticisms of Texas Democrat James Talarico over policy positions. These exchanges align with his approach to opponents and media figures. Scheduled events such as upcoming briefings, Truth Social activity, and political rallies within the resolution window could influence outcomes, though the high implied probabilities reflect traders’ assessment that such rhetoric remains a consistent element of his public communication style.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan