**Trump's established pattern of direct public criticism continues to shape trader views on date-specific insult markets.** As president in June 2026, he has repeatedly targeted foreign leaders during the ongoing G7 summit in France, including references to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as “Governor” amid trade disputes and dismissals of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as lacking Churchill-like resolve over Iran policy differences. Similar exchanges have occurred with French President Emmanuel Macron and in Oval Office or press settings, where Trump has labeled journalists such as CNN’s Kaitlan Collins and NBC’s Kristen Welker in personal terms. These incidents align with his documented approach on social platforms and in public remarks. Markets reflect this baseline frequency, with traders monitoring scheduled press conferences, summit sessions, and social media activity for resolution triggers on specific dates. Historical volume on related Polymarket contracts underscores consistent engagement around such events.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui$1,710,712 Vol.
Jun 30, 2026
June 28
99%
June 29
92%
June 30
92%
$1,710,712 Vol.
June 28
$9,036 Vol.
99%
June 29
$4,217 Vol.
92%
June 30
$2,700 Vol.
92%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.**Trump's established pattern of direct public criticism continues to shape trader views on date-specific insult markets.** As president in June 2026, he has repeatedly targeted foreign leaders during the ongoing G7 summit in France, including references to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as “Governor” amid trade disputes and dismissals of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as lacking Churchill-like resolve over Iran policy differences. Similar exchanges have occurred with French President Emmanuel Macron and in Oval Office or press settings, where Trump has labeled journalists such as CNN’s Kaitlan Collins and NBC’s Kristen Welker in personal terms. These incidents align with his documented approach on social platforms and in public remarks. Markets reflect this baseline frequency, with traders monitoring scheduled press conferences, summit sessions, and social media activity for resolution triggers on specific dates. Historical volume on related Polymarket contracts underscores consistent engagement around such events.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Pasar Dibuka: Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ET
Volume
$1,710,712Tanggal Berakhir
Jun 30, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.**Trump's established pattern of direct public criticism continues to shape trader views on date-specific insult markets.** As president in June 2026, he has repeatedly targeted foreign leaders during the ongoing G7 summit in France, including references to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as “Governor” amid trade disputes and dismissals of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as lacking Churchill-like resolve over Iran policy differences. Similar exchanges have occurred with French President Emmanuel Macron and in Oval Office or press settings, where Trump has labeled journalists such as CNN’s Kaitlan Collins and NBC’s Kristen Welker in personal terms. These incidents align with his documented approach on social platforms and in public remarks. Markets reflect this baseline frequency, with traders monitoring scheduled press conferences, summit sessions, and social media activity for resolution triggers on specific dates. Historical volume on related Polymarket contracts underscores consistent engagement around such events.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$1,710,712Tanggal Berakhir
Jun 30, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...**Trump's established pattern of direct public criticism continues to shape trader views on date-specific insult markets.** As president in June 2026, he has repeatedly targeted foreign leaders during the ongoing G7 summit in France, including references to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as “Governor” amid trade disputes and dismissals of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as lacking Churchill-like resolve over Iran policy differences. Similar exchanges have occurred with French President Emmanuel Macron and in Oval Office or press settings, where Trump has labeled journalists such as CNN’s Kaitlan Collins and NBC’s Kristen Welker in personal terms. These incidents align with his documented approach on social platforms and in public remarks. Markets reflect this baseline frequency, with traders monitoring scheduled press conferences, summit sessions, and social media activity for resolution triggers on specific dates. Historical volume on related Polymarket contracts underscores consistent engagement around such events.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan