Anthropic holds the strongest position for second place in Code Arena WebDev due to Claude Fable 5.1 and related models consistently ranking immediately behind OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra on the community Elo leaderboard, with scores around 1758–1762 versus the leader’s 1797–1800 as of mid-September. The gap reflects Anthropic’s edge in multi-step agentic workflows, tool use, and iterative frontend coding that the crowdsourced benchmark rewards. Other labs trail further: Moonshot’s Kimi K3, Alibaba’s Qwen variants, and Meta models sit in the 1600–1680 range with less momentum in recent votes. With resolution imminent, traders see limited room for a late surge from lower-ranked players absent major releases, while OpenAI’s lead makes a swap unlikely before month-end.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoSecondo miglior Code Arena WebDev AI Lab a fine settembre?
Secondo miglior Code Arena WebDev AI Lab a fine settembre?
Anthropic 61.2%
OpenAI 34.8%
Alibaba 3.5%
Moonshot 1.9%
$82,019 Vol.
$82,019 Vol.
30 set 2026
Anthropic
55%
OpenAI
35%
Alibaba
3%
Moonshot
2%
SpaceXAI
1%
Z.ai
<1%
Tencent
<1%
Meta
<1%
ByteDance
<1%
MiniMax
<1%
<1%
Xiaomi
<1%
DeepSeek
<1%
Thinky
<1%
Poolside
<1%
Mistral
<1%
Anthropic 61.2%
OpenAI 34.8%
Alibaba 3.5%
Moonshot 1.9%
$82,019 Vol.
$82,019 Vol.
30 set 2026
Anthropic
$19,970 Vol.
55%
OpenAI
$12,854 Vol.
35%
Alibaba
$17,592 Vol.
3%
Moonshot
$12,520 Vol.
2%
SpaceXAI
$2,591 Vol.
1%
Z.ai
$2,107 Vol.
<1%
Tencent
$1,987 Vol.
<1%
Meta
$1,709 Vol.
<1%
ByteDance
$3,054 Vol.
<1%
MiniMax
$598 Vol.
<1%
$1,766 Vol.
<1%
Xiaomi
$1,468 Vol.
<1%
DeepSeek
$1,022 Vol.
<1%
Thinky
$617 Vol.
<1%
Poolside
$1,035 Vol.
<1%
Mistral
$1,130 Vol.
<1%
This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Anthropic holds the strongest position for second place in Code Arena WebDev due to Claude Fable 5.1 and related models consistently ranking immediately behind OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra on the community Elo leaderboard, with scores around 1758–1762 versus the leader’s 1797–1800 as of mid-September. The gap reflects Anthropic’s edge in multi-step agentic workflows, tool use, and iterative frontend coding that the crowdsourced benchmark rewards. Other labs trail further: Moonshot’s Kimi K3, Alibaba’s Qwen variants, and Meta models sit in the 1600–1680 range with less momentum in recent votes. With resolution imminent, traders see limited room for a late surge from lower-ranked players absent major releases, while OpenAI’s lead makes a swap unlikely before month-end.
This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Mercato aperto: Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ET
Volume
$82,019Data di fine
1 ott 2026Mercato aperto
Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ETFonte di risoluzione
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsRisolutore
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Anthropic holds the strongest position for second place in Code Arena WebDev due to Claude Fable 5.1 and related models consistently ranking immediately behind OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra on the community Elo leaderboard, with scores around 1758–1762 versus the leader’s 1797–1800 as of mid-September. The gap reflects Anthropic’s edge in multi-step agentic workflows, tool use, and iterative frontend coding that the crowdsourced benchmark rewards. Other labs trail further: Moonshot’s Kimi K3, Alibaba’s Qwen variants, and Meta models sit in the 1600–1680 range with less momentum in recent votes. With resolution imminent, traders see limited room for a late surge from lower-ranked players absent major releases, while OpenAI’s lead makes a swap unlikely before month-end.
This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Volume
$82,019Data di fine
1 ott 2026Mercato aperto
Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ETFonte di risoluzione
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsRisolutore
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic holds the strongest position for second place in Code Arena WebDev due to Claude Fable 5.1 and related models consistently ranking immediately behind OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra on the community Elo leaderboard, with scores around 1758–1762 versus the leader’s 1797–1800 as of mid-September. The gap reflects Anthropic’s edge in multi-step agentic workflows, tool use, and iterative frontend coding that the crowdsourced benchmark rewards. Other labs trail further: Moonshot’s Kimi K3, Alibaba’s Qwen variants, and Meta models sit in the 1600–1680 range with less momentum in recent votes. With resolution imminent, traders see limited room for a late surge from lower-ranked players absent major releases, while OpenAI’s lead makes a swap unlikely before month-end.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti