President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트$799,986 거래량
2026.06.30
Jimmy Kimmel
44%
Megyn Kelly
36%
Nicolás Maduro
34%
Emmanuel Macron
32%
Keir Starmer
28%
Norah O'Donnell
31%
Zohran Mamdani
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
22%
Alex Jones
30%
Freidrich Merz
12%
Elon Musk
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Vladimir Putin
5%
Pam Bondi
4%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Melania Trump
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
$799,986 거래량
Jimmy Kimmel
$41,096 거래량
44%
Megyn Kelly
$457 거래량
36%
Nicolás Maduro
$4,223 거래량
34%
Emmanuel Macron
$10,115 거래량
32%
Keir Starmer
$1,413 거래량
28%
Norah O'Donnell
$637 거래량
31%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,461 거래량
25%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$78,996 거래량
22%
Alex Jones
$500 거래량
30%
Freidrich Merz
$7,916 거래량
12%
Elon Musk
$6,720 거래량
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$5,204 거래량
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$11,561 거래량
5%
Vladimir Putin
$11,229 거래량
5%
Pam Bondi
$3,115 거래량
4%
J.D. Vance
$4,335 거래량
4%
Xi Jinping
$47,626 거래량
3%
Melania Trump
$6,591 거래량
2%
Viktor Orbán
$4,796 거래량
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
마켓 개설일: May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ET
거래량
$799,986종료일
2026.06.30마켓 개설일
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
거래량
$799,986종료일
2026.06.30마켓 개설일
May 26, 2026, 6:34 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's second-term rhetoric has featured a marked rise in personal insults and profanity directed at journalists and political opponents, as documented in analyses of his speeches and Truth Social posts. In the past two weeks, he has targeted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over perceived bias and appearance, NBC's Kristen Welker during a contentious Meet the Press interview, and Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner with terms like "thug" and "pig." These exchanges align with his established pattern of responding to critical coverage or electoral challenges. With the June 30 resolution date approaching, ongoing press interactions, Senate races, and policy disputes could prompt further public statements, though the specific targets remain dependent on unfolding events. Trader consensus reflects this recent cadence of commentary.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
자주 묻는 질문