Ongoing peace negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and the United States continue without agreement on binding limits to Ukraine’s armed forces, as Moscow maintains demands for severe caps and neutrality while Kyiv rejects reductions that would constrain mobilization or self-defense capacity. Recent talks involving U.S. envoys in Moscow in early September 2026 produced no breakthrough on troop ceilings, with Russia reiterating maximalist positions from prior frameworks. Ukraine’s internal military reforms, including phased demobilization planned for late 2026, reflect domestic restructuring rather than treaty commitments. The 95.5% trader consensus on “No” reflects these entrenched gaps and the absence of any verified diplomatic progress toward a pre-2027 accord. A sudden ceasefire framework or major shift in battlefield realities could still reopen discussions on force structures before the deadline.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว$115,878 ปริมาณ
$115,878 ปริมาณ
$115,878 ปริมาณ
$115,878 ปริมาณ
An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Nov 20, 2025, 6:10 PM ET
ผู้ตัดสินผล
0x65070BE91...An official pledge by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces will qualify for a “Yes” resolution whether as a unilateral announcement or part of an agreement with the Russian Federation.
A qualifying agreement must include a commitment by Ukraine to limit the total number of personnel in its armed forces. This includes any specific numerical cap on the number of personnel Ukraine may have in its armed forces, or any proportional limit on Ukrainian armed forces personnel (e.g., a commitment to reduce the size of the armed forces by a percentage of its current size). Limits on the number of personnel in specific branches of the Ukrainian armed forces will not count.
Other limits on Ukrainian military powers, such as the relinquishment of long-range weapons or limits on other categories of armaments or military capabilities, that do not constrain the total number of personnel in Ukraine’s armed forces, will not qualify.
An agreement by Ukraine to limit the number of personnel in its armed forces as a precondition of a more comprehensive peace process or deal will qualify, even if the agreement is not yet finalized or part of a formalized peace deal. The September 8, 1995 “Agreed Basic Principles” between Bosnia and Yugoslavia which recognized the borders and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was later formalized through the Dayton Peace Agreement is an example of a qualifying agreement.
Any agreement or pledge made before the resolution date of this market will qualify, regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect.
The primary resolution source for this market will be an official announcement by Ukraine; however, an overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming a qualifying agreement has been made will also qualify.
ผู้ตัดสินผล
0x65070BE91...Ongoing peace negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and the United States continue without agreement on binding limits to Ukraine’s armed forces, as Moscow maintains demands for severe caps and neutrality while Kyiv rejects reductions that would constrain mobilization or self-defense capacity. Recent talks involving U.S. envoys in Moscow in early September 2026 produced no breakthrough on troop ceilings, with Russia reiterating maximalist positions from prior frameworks. Ukraine’s internal military reforms, including phased demobilization planned for late 2026, reflect domestic restructuring rather than treaty commitments. The 95.5% trader consensus on “No” reflects these entrenched gaps and the absence of any verified diplomatic progress toward a pre-2027 accord. A sudden ceasefire framework or major shift in battlefield realities could still reopen discussions on force structures before the deadline.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว



ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย