Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว$133,910 ปริมาณ
Sep 30, 2026
Mark Carney
85%
Jon Ossoff
76%
Tucker Carlson
74%
Kathy Hochul
42%
Letitia James
39%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Andy Burnham
22%
Friedrich Merz
22%
Jerome Powell
21%
Emmanuel Macron
19%
Candace Owens
30%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Stephen Colbert
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Alex Jones
15%
Pam Bondi
8%
Megyn Kelly
41%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
56%
Melania Trump
33%
Elon Musk
41%
Jimmy Kimmel
62%
Ilhan Omar
57%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
64%
Hillary Clinton
55%
Elizabeth Warren
51%
Adam Schiff
50%
$133,910 ปริมาณ
Mark Carney
$4,606 ปริมาณ
85%
Jon Ossoff
$123 ปริมาณ
76%
Tucker Carlson
$2,917 ปริมาณ
74%
Kathy Hochul
$2,180 ปริมาณ
42%
Letitia James
$742 ปริมาณ
39%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,497 ปริมาณ
30%
Andy Burnham
$3,496 ปริมาณ
22%
Friedrich Merz
$2,208 ปริมาณ
22%
Jerome Powell
$1,799 ปริมาณ
21%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,403 ปริมาณ
19%
Candace Owens
$3,037 ปริมาณ
30%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,636 ปริมาณ
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 ปริมาณ
7%
Stephen Colbert
$321 ปริมาณ
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 ปริมาณ
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,386 ปริมาณ
6%
Kevin Warsh
$76,045 ปริมาณ
6%
J.D. Vance
$1,522 ปริมาณ
4%
Xi Jinping
$2,078 ปริมาณ
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,642 ปริมาณ
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 ปริมาณ
2%
Alex Jones
$204 ปริมาณ
15%
Pam Bondi
$263 ปริมาณ
8%
Megyn Kelly
$397 ปริมาณ
41%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,515 ปริมาณ
56%
Melania Trump
$101 ปริมาณ
33%
Elon Musk
$163 ปริมาณ
41%
Jimmy Kimmel
$913 ปริมาณ
62%
Ilhan Omar
$419 ปริมาณ
57%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$235 ปริมาณ
64%
Hillary Clinton
$1,980 ปริมาณ
55%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 ปริมาณ
51%
Adam Schiff
$61 ปริมาณ
50%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$133,910วันสิ้นสุด
Sep 30, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETผู้ตัดสินผล
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$133,910วันสิ้นสุด
Sep 30, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETผู้ตัดสินผล
0x65070BE91...Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย