Trump’s pattern of issuing pointed criticisms through Truth Social posts and public remarks has intensified around ongoing policy disputes, including the Iran conflict, EU tariffs, and domestic political opponents. In recent days he has targeted figures such as Democratic lawmakers, a reporter questioning White House construction costs, and European leaders over their Iran comments, reinforcing expectations that similar statements could occur before the May 31 deadline. With the president returning from a China trip and maintaining an active schedule of remarks and social-media activity, traders focus on whether these exchanges will again produce public insults directed at specific individuals or remain general in tone.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено$102,579 Обс.
May 31, 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
66%
Freidrich Merz
37%
Nicolás Maduro
34%
Tucker Carlson
32%
Megyn Kelly
21%
Keir Starmer
19%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
Kaitlan Collins
16%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Alex Jones
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Benjamin Netanyahu
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Elon Musk
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$102,579 Обс.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,569 Обс.
66%
Freidrich Merz
$1,791 Обс.
37%
Nicolás Maduro
$4,389 Обс.
34%
Tucker Carlson
$4,436 Обс.
32%
Megyn Kelly
$3,383 Обс.
21%
Keir Starmer
$2,766 Обс.
19%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 Обс.
19%
Kaitlan Collins
$262 Обс.
16%
Emmanuel Macron
$537 Обс.
12%
Alex Jones
$77 Обс.
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 Обс.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$130 Обс.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,385 Обс.
6%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$426 Обс.
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,441 Обс.
3%
Elon Musk
$1,468 Обс.
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 Обс.
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,317 Обс.
3%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 Обс.
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 Обс.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of issuing pointed criticisms through Truth Social posts and public remarks has intensified around ongoing policy disputes, including the Iran conflict, EU tariffs, and domestic political opponents. In recent days he has targeted figures such as Democratic lawmakers, a reporter questioning White House construction costs, and European leaders over their Iran comments, reinforcing expectations that similar statements could occur before the May 31 deadline. With the president returning from a China trip and maintaining an active schedule of remarks and social-media activity, traders focus on whether these exchanges will again produce public insults directed at specific individuals or remain general in tone.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Ринок відкрито: Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
Обсяг
$102,579Дата завершення
May 31, 2026Ринок відкрито
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of issuing pointed criticisms through Truth Social posts and public remarks has intensified around ongoing policy disputes, including the Iran conflict, EU tariffs, and domestic political opponents. In recent days he has targeted figures such as Democratic lawmakers, a reporter questioning White House construction costs, and European leaders over their Iran comments, reinforcing expectations that similar statements could occur before the May 31 deadline. With the president returning from a China trip and maintaining an active schedule of remarks and social-media activity, traders focus on whether these exchanges will again produce public insults directed at specific individuals or remain general in tone.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Обсяг
$102,579Дата завершення
May 31, 2026Ринок відкрито
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump’s pattern of issuing pointed criticisms through Truth Social posts and public remarks has intensified around ongoing policy disputes, including the Iran conflict, EU tariffs, and domestic political opponents. In recent days he has targeted figures such as Democratic lawmakers, a reporter questioning White House construction costs, and European leaders over their Iran comments, reinforcing expectations that similar statements could occur before the May 31 deadline. With the president returning from a China trip and maintaining an active schedule of remarks and social-media activity, traders focus on whether these exchanges will again produce public insults directed at specific individuals or remain general in tone.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання