Tensions between the United States and Denmark over Greenland peaked in early 2026 after President Trump renewed calls for U.S. acquisition of the territory, including ambiguous references to force or economic pressure, prompting Danish military reinforcements, NATO coordination, and contingency planning by Copenhagen. Subsequent developments shifted toward diplomacy: Trump explicitly ruled out military action in January statements, bilateral talks advanced on expanded U.S. basing rights under existing treaties, and July NATO summit remarks reiterated interest without triggering escalation. As NATO allies bound by mutual defense commitments, both sides have prioritized negotiations over confrontation, with no verified military incidents or mobilizations signaling imminent clash. Traders assign 97.9% probability to no clash before 2027 based on this de-escalatory trajectory and institutional barriers. Late developments such as stalled base talks, renewed tariff threats tied to annexation demands, or unforeseen Arctic incidents involving third parties could still introduce volatility, though the short remaining window limits realistic pathways.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于是
2% 概率
$80,151 交易量
$80,151 交易量
2026-12-31
是
2% 概率
$80,151 交易量
$80,151 交易量
2026-12-31
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Tensions between the United States and Denmark over Greenland peaked in early 2026 after President Trump renewed calls for U.S. acquisition of the territory, including ambiguous references to force or economic pressure, prompting Danish military reinforcements, NATO coordination, and contingency planning by Copenhagen. Subsequent developments shifted toward diplomacy: Trump explicitly ruled out military action in January statements, bilateral talks advanced on expanded U.S. basing rights under existing treaties, and July NATO summit remarks reiterated interest without triggering escalation. As NATO allies bound by mutual defense commitments, both sides have prioritized negotiations over confrontation, with no verified military incidents or mobilizations signaling imminent clash. Traders assign 97.9% probability to no clash before 2027 based on this de-escalatory trajectory and institutional barriers. Late developments such as stalled base talks, renewed tariff threats tied to annexation demands, or unforeseen Arctic incidents involving third parties could still introduce volatility, though the short remaining window limits realistic pathways.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Jan 14, 2026, 10:50 AM ET
交易量
$80,151结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Jan 14, 2026, 10:50 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Tensions between the United States and Denmark over Greenland peaked in early 2026 after President Trump renewed calls for U.S. acquisition of the territory, including ambiguous references to force or economic pressure, prompting Danish military reinforcements, NATO coordination, and contingency planning by Copenhagen. Subsequent developments shifted toward diplomacy: Trump explicitly ruled out military action in January statements, bilateral talks advanced on expanded U.S. basing rights under existing treaties, and July NATO summit remarks reiterated interest without triggering escalation. As NATO allies bound by mutual defense commitments, both sides have prioritized negotiations over confrontation, with no verified military incidents or mobilizations signaling imminent clash. Traders assign 97.9% probability to no clash before 2027 based on this de-escalatory trajectory and institutional barriers. Late developments such as stalled base talks, renewed tariff threats tied to annexation demands, or unforeseen Arctic incidents involving third parties could still introduce volatility, though the short remaining window limits realistic pathways.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of the United States and Denmark between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between US and Danish military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: the United States Coast Guard is considered part of the United States military, and the Royal Danish Navy and other branches of the Danish Armed Forces are considered part of Denmark’s military.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$80,151结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Jan 14, 2026, 10:50 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Tensions between the United States and Denmark over Greenland peaked in early 2026 after President Trump renewed calls for U.S. acquisition of the territory, including ambiguous references to force or economic pressure, prompting Danish military reinforcements, NATO coordination, and contingency planning by Copenhagen. Subsequent developments shifted toward diplomacy: Trump explicitly ruled out military action in January statements, bilateral talks advanced on expanded U.S. basing rights under existing treaties, and July NATO summit remarks reiterated interest without triggering escalation. As NATO allies bound by mutual defense commitments, both sides have prioritized negotiations over confrontation, with no verified military incidents or mobilizations signaling imminent clash. Traders assign 97.9% probability to no clash before 2027 based on this de-escalatory trajectory and institutional barriers. Late developments such as stalled base talks, renewed tariff threats tied to annexation demands, or unforeseen Arctic incidents involving third parties could still introduce volatility, though the short remaining window limits realistic pathways.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题