President Donald Trump has maintained a pattern of direct public criticisms toward journalists and political figures during his second term, with multiple recent exchanges in September 2026 involving reporters from outlets such as Bloomberg, ABC, and CNN. These incidents coincide with administration actions including White House access restrictions on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage disputes, alongside legal challenges and midterm election pressures. Ongoing developments around the Iran conflict, energy prices, and court rulings on voting procedures have contributed to heightened tensions in official remarks and press interactions. With the September 30 resolution date approaching, scheduled appearances including the UN General Assembly address represent near-term opportunities for additional statements. Trader assessments reflect the frequency of such exchanges in comparable periods.
Polymarket ডেটা রেফারেন্স করে পরীক্ষামূলক AI-জেনারেটেড সারাংশ। এটি ট্রেডিং পরামর্শ নয় এবং এই মার্কেট কীভাবে রেজলভ হয় তাতে কোনো ভূমিকা রাখে না। · আপডেটেড$145,820 Vol.
Sep 30, 2026
Mark Carney
77%
Tucker Carlson
67%
Jon Ossoff
69%
Ilhan Omar
31%
Elizabeth Warren
22%
Hillary Clinton
27%
Letitia James
21%
Adam Schiff
22%
Kathy Hochul
21%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
16%
Andy Burnham
17%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
17%
Megyn Kelly
12%
Candace Owens
28%
Elon Musk
16%
Friedrich Merz
15%
Zohran Mamdani
14%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Jimmy Kimmel
10%
Jerome Powell
9%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Stephen Colbert
13%
Pam Bondi
7%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Karoline Leavitt
4%
Benjamin Netanyahu
4%
Kevin Warsh
3%
Xi Jinping
2%
Vladimir Putin
2%
J.D. Vance
1%
Alex Jones
16%
Melania Trump
18%
$145,820 Vol.
Mark Carney
$5,862 Vol.
77%
Tucker Carlson
$3,373 Vol.
67%
Jon Ossoff
$443 Vol.
69%
Ilhan Omar
$524 Vol.
31%
Elizabeth Warren
$711 Vol.
22%
Hillary Clinton
$2,203 Vol.
27%
Letitia James
$852 Vol.
21%
Adam Schiff
$97 Vol.
22%
Kathy Hochul
$2,447 Vol.
21%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,731 Vol.
16%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Vol.
17%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$249 Vol.
17%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Vol.
12%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Vol.
28%
Elon Musk
$170 Vol.
16%
Friedrich Merz
$3,563 Vol.
15%
Zohran Mamdani
$3,200 Vol.
14%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,708 Vol.
12%
Jimmy Kimmel
$1,018 Vol.
10%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 Vol.
9%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Vol.
7%
Stephen Colbert
$326 Vol.
13%
Pam Bondi
$263 Vol.
7%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Vol.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,386 Vol.
5%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
4%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$2,143 Vol.
4%
Kevin Warsh
$80,817 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$2,189 Vol.
2%
Vladimir Putin
$2,778 Vol.
2%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 Vol.
1%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
16%
Melania Trump
$101 Vol.
18%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has maintained a pattern of direct public criticisms toward journalists and political figures during his second term, with multiple recent exchanges in September 2026 involving reporters from outlets such as Bloomberg, ABC, and CNN. These incidents coincide with administration actions including White House access restrictions on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage disputes, alongside legal challenges and midterm election pressures. Ongoing developments around the Iran conflict, energy prices, and court rulings on voting procedures have contributed to heightened tensions in official remarks and press interactions. With the September 30 resolution date approaching, scheduled appearances including the UN General Assembly address represent near-term opportunities for additional statements. Trader assessments reflect the frequency of such exchanges in comparable periods.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
মার্কেট ওপেন হয়েছে: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
ভলিউম
$145,820শেষ তারিখ
Sep 30, 2026মার্কেট ওপেন হয়েছে
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETরেজলভার
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has maintained a pattern of direct public criticisms toward journalists and political figures during his second term, with multiple recent exchanges in September 2026 involving reporters from outlets such as Bloomberg, ABC, and CNN. These incidents coincide with administration actions including White House access restrictions on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage disputes, alongside legal challenges and midterm election pressures. Ongoing developments around the Iran conflict, energy prices, and court rulings on voting procedures have contributed to heightened tensions in official remarks and press interactions. With the September 30 resolution date approaching, scheduled appearances including the UN General Assembly address represent near-term opportunities for additional statements. Trader assessments reflect the frequency of such exchanges in comparable periods.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
ভলিউম
$145,820শেষ তারিখ
Sep 30, 2026মার্কেট ওপেন হয়েছে
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETরেজলভার
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump has maintained a pattern of direct public criticisms toward journalists and political figures during his second term, with multiple recent exchanges in September 2026 involving reporters from outlets such as Bloomberg, ABC, and CNN. These incidents coincide with administration actions including White House access restrictions on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage disputes, alongside legal challenges and midterm election pressures. Ongoing developments around the Iran conflict, energy prices, and court rulings on voting procedures have contributed to heightened tensions in official remarks and press interactions. With the September 30 resolution date approaching, scheduled appearances including the UN General Assembly address represent near-term opportunities for additional statements. Trader assessments reflect the frequency of such exchanges in comparable periods.
Polymarket ডেটা রেফারেন্স করে পরীক্ষামূলক AI-জেনারেটেড সারাংশ। এটি ট্রেডিং পরামর্শ নয় এবং এই মার্কেট কীভাবে রেজলভ হয় তাতে কোনো ভূমিকা রাখে না। · আপডেটেড
বাহ্যিক লিংক থেকে সাবধান।
বাহ্যিক লিংক থেকে সাবধান।
সচরাচর জিজ্ঞাসা