The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, without extension or replacement has left U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear forces without binding numerical limits or verification for the first time in decades. Russia proposed in September 2025 that both sides voluntarily observe the treaty’s central warhead and launcher caps for one additional year, a step Moscow reaffirmed after expiration if Washington reciprocates. The Trump administration instead signaled preference for negotiating a new, modernized bilateral or trilateral agreement that incorporates China and broader limits on all warheads. Diplomatic contacts have continued on the sidelines of other talks, but no framework, timeline, or verification measures have been announced. Congressional hearings have examined strategic stability risks in an unconstrained environment while underscoring the value of renewed arms control. Trader consensus on near-term deal prospects reflects these stalled bilateral dynamics and the added complexity of multilateral inclusion.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedU.S. x Russia Nuclear deal by...?
$604,093 Vol.
June 30
<1%
July 31
9%
$604,093 Vol.
June 30
<1%
July 31
9%
Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Market Opened: Dec 10, 2025, 7:05 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, without extension or replacement has left U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear forces without binding numerical limits or verification for the first time in decades. Russia proposed in September 2025 that both sides voluntarily observe the treaty’s central warhead and launcher caps for one additional year, a step Moscow reaffirmed after expiration if Washington reciprocates. The Trump administration instead signaled preference for negotiating a new, modernized bilateral or trilateral agreement that incorporates China and broader limits on all warheads. Diplomatic contacts have continued on the sidelines of other talks, but no framework, timeline, or verification measures have been announced. Congressional hearings have examined strategic stability risks in an unconstrained environment while underscoring the value of renewed arms control. Trader consensus on near-term deal prospects reflects these stalled bilateral dynamics and the added complexity of multilateral inclusion.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions