President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui$105,262 Vol.
May 31, 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
66%
Nicolás Maduro
39%
Freidrich Merz
32%
Tucker Carlson
30%
Megyn Kelly
21%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
Kaitlan Collins
17%
Keir Starmer
15%
Alex Jones
13%
Emmanuel Macron
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
7%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
4%
Elon Musk
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
J.D. Vance
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$105,262 Vol.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,569 Vol.
66%
Nicolás Maduro
$6,396 Vol.
39%
Freidrich Merz
$1,791 Vol.
32%
Tucker Carlson
$4,451 Vol.
30%
Megyn Kelly
$3,417 Vol.
21%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 Vol.
19%
Kaitlan Collins
$262 Vol.
17%
Keir Starmer
$2,925 Vol.
15%
Alex Jones
$87 Vol.
13%
Emmanuel Macron
$583 Vol.
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 Vol.
10%
Mohammed bin Salman
$130 Vol.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,436 Vol.
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$452 Vol.
4%
Elon Musk
$1,468 Vol.
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,404 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,687 Vol.
2%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 Vol.
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Pasar Dibuka: Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
Volume
$105,262Tanggal Berakhir
May 31, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$105,262Tanggal Berakhir
May 31, 2026Pasar Dibuka
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
Ringkasan eksperimental yang dihasilkan AI dengan referensi data Polymarket. Ini bukan saran trading dan tidak berperan dalam bagaimana pasar ini diselesaikan. · Diperbarui
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Hati-hati dengan link eksternal.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan