Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato$133,910 Vol.
30 set 2026
Mark Carney
85%
Jon Ossoff
76%
Tucker Carlson
74%
Kathy Hochul
42%
Letitia James
39%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Andy Burnham
22%
Friedrich Merz
22%
Jerome Powell
21%
Emmanuel Macron
19%
Candace Owens
30%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
7%
Stephen Colbert
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Papa Leone XIV
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
4%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Alex Jones
15%
Pam Bondi
8%
Megyn Kelly
41%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
56%
Melania Trump
33%
Elon Musk
41%
Jimmy Kimmel
62%
Ilhan Omar
57%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
64%
Hillary Clinton
55%
Elizabeth Warren
51%
Adam Schiff
50%
$133,910 Vol.
Mark Carney
$4,606 Vol.
85%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Vol.
76%
Tucker Carlson
$2,917 Vol.
74%
Kathy Hochul
$2,180 Vol.
42%
Letitia James
$742 Vol.
39%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,497 Vol.
30%
Andy Burnham
$3,496 Vol.
22%
Friedrich Merz
$2,208 Vol.
22%
Jerome Powell
$1,799 Vol.
21%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,403 Vol.
19%
Candace Owens
$3,037 Vol.
30%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,636 Vol.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Vol.
7%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Vol.
6%
Papa Leone XIV
$1,386 Vol.
6%
Kevin Warsh
$76,045 Vol.
6%
J.D. Vance
$1,522 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$2,078 Vol.
4%
Vladimir Putin
$2,642 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
2%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
15%
Pam Bondi
$263 Vol.
8%
Megyn Kelly
$397 Vol.
41%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,515 Vol.
56%
Melania Trump
$101 Vol.
33%
Elon Musk
$163 Vol.
41%
Jimmy Kimmel
$913 Vol.
62%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Vol.
57%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$235 Vol.
64%
Hillary Clinton
$1,980 Vol.
55%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
51%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
50%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercato aperto: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$133,910Data di fine
30 set 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$133,910Data di fine
30 set 2026Mercato aperto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...Trump’s pattern of public criticism toward media outlets, journalists, and political figures has intensified amid midterm pressures, Supreme Court setbacks on voting rules, and foreign policy friction including Iran-related developments. In mid-September 2026 he singled out the New York Times and Washington Post as “fake news” and “disgusting” during an Oval Office exchange, while repeatedly faulting reporters’ questions and appearances in prior weeks. He has also layered personal remarks about appearance and style onto his endorsement of Texas candidate Ken Paxton. With the resolution window closing September 30 and scheduled appearances including a UN address, traders weigh the likelihood that ongoing tensions with Democrats, state officials, or press figures will produce additional named targets before the deadline.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti