Strong trader consensus favoring "No" at 92.5% stems from the absence of legal personhood for artificial intelligence systems under current frameworks, which treat large language models and other AI as tools or property rather than entities capable of independent criminal liability. Developers and companies remain the accountable parties in all established precedents, with no regulatory or judicial shifts as of mid-2026 indicating AI could face direct charges by the 2027 deadline. While rapid capability advances in machine learning continue, they have not altered core liability doctrines. Realistic challenges include unexpected legislative reforms granting limited AI rights or novel court interpretations of autonomy, though such developments remain highly speculative given historical regulatory timelines and ongoing focus on developer oversight rather than machine accountability.