Traders view the LiveBench coding market as highly competitive heading into late October, with Anthropic holding a modest edge at 58% implied probability thanks to its Claude models' demonstrated strengths in code generation, debugging, and multi-step reasoning on established benchmarks. Several other labs sit near 50%, while OpenAI trails at 29.5%, underscoring uncertainty over which frontier large language models will deliver the strongest coding performance after the next wave of releases. Differentiating factors include targeted fine-tuning on programming datasets, integration of agentic tools for real-world software tasks, and raw gains on complex algorithmic challenges. Upcoming model updates and benchmark iterations remain key swing catalysts.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoQual empresa tem o melhor modelo de IA no LiveBench (Coding) no final de outubro?
Anthropic 59%
OpenAI 30%
DeepSeek 4.9%
Xiaomi 4.0%

Anthropic
59%

OpenAI
30%

DeepSeek
5%

Xiaomi
4%

Nvidia
3%

Thinky
2%

MiniMax
2%

Mistral
2%

2%

Microsoft
1%

Amazon
1%

Alibaba
1%

Baidu
1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

Tencent
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Meta
<1%

ByteDance
<1%
Anthropic 59%
OpenAI 30%
DeepSeek 4.9%
Xiaomi 4.0%

Anthropic
59%

OpenAI
30%

DeepSeek
5%

Xiaomi
4%

Nvidia
3%

Thinky
2%

MiniMax
2%

Mistral
2%

2%

Microsoft
1%

Amazon
1%

Alibaba
1%

Baidu
1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

Meituan
<1%

Moonshot
<1%

Tencent
<1%

StepFun
<1%

Meta
<1%

ByteDance
<1%
Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Mercado Aberto: Aug 12, 2026, 8:05 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Results from the “Coding” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Coding, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Coding,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Traders view the LiveBench coding market as highly competitive heading into late October, with Anthropic holding a modest edge at 58% implied probability thanks to its Claude models' demonstrated strengths in code generation, debugging, and multi-step reasoning on established benchmarks. Several other labs sit near 50%, while OpenAI trails at 29.5%, underscoring uncertainty over which frontier large language models will deliver the strongest coding performance after the next wave of releases. Differentiating factors include targeted fine-tuning on programming datasets, integration of agentic tools for real-world software tasks, and raw gains on complex algorithmic challenges. Upcoming model updates and benchmark iterations remain key swing catalysts.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions