President Donald Trump's ongoing state visit to Beijing for a high-stakes summit with Xi Jinping, featuring a bilateral meeting on May 13, drives overwhelming trader consensus at 96.5% for "No" on public insults this week. Pre-trip comments from Trump highlighted a "fantastic relationship" with Xi and anticipated a "big fat hug," signaling diplomatic warmth amid discussions on Iran ceasefire, trade, and economic ties, contrasting past tensions. No recent statements from Trump criticize Xi, with focus on cooperation reflecting improved bilateral relations. Realistic shifts could arise from summit breakdowns, such as failed Iran negotiations or trade impasses prompting post-meeting Truth Social posts, though historical precedent favors cordial public rhetoric during such engagements.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоWill Trump Insult Xi this week?
Will Trump Insult Xi this week?
$60,701 Обс.
$60,701 Обс.
$60,701 Обс.
$60,701 Обс.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Ринок відкрито: May 11, 2026, 4:18 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump's ongoing state visit to Beijing for a high-stakes summit with Xi Jinping, featuring a bilateral meeting on May 13, drives overwhelming trader consensus at 96.5% for "No" on public insults this week. Pre-trip comments from Trump highlighted a "fantastic relationship" with Xi and anticipated a "big fat hug," signaling diplomatic warmth amid discussions on Iran ceasefire, trade, and economic ties, contrasting past tensions. No recent statements from Trump criticize Xi, with focus on cooperation reflecting improved bilateral relations. Realistic shifts could arise from summit breakdowns, such as failed Iran negotiations or trade impasses prompting post-meeting Truth Social posts, though historical precedent favors cordial public rhetoric during such engagements.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання