Recent White House deliberations around potential pre-deployment oversight for frontier AI models have fueled market positioning, yet the absence of any formal executive order through mid-May keeps the implied probability of a mandatory federal review by May 31 firmly at 88.5% for No. Officials have floated voluntary partnerships via NIST’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation, including early access agreements with Google, Microsoft, and xAI, while senior advisers explicitly distanced the administration from binding regulation in favor of industry collaboration. Prior Trump-era executive orders focused on deregulation and preempting state rules, creating precedent against sudden mandates. With only two weeks remaining, traders view the combination of internal caution, limited time, and emphasis on security testing without enforcement as the dominant factors sustaining strong consensus on No.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於是
$62,961 交易量
$62,961 交易量
2026-05-31
是
$62,961 交易量
$62,961 交易量
2026-05-31
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a federal government review process for the public release of new artificial intelligence models by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government.
Legislation or executive actions which create a group or committee responsible for overseeing artificial intelligence matters will only qualify if they explicitly create a qualifying review process.
Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Recent White House deliberations around potential pre-deployment oversight for frontier AI models have fueled market positioning, yet the absence of any formal executive order through mid-May keeps the implied probability of a mandatory federal review by May 31 firmly at 88.5% for No. Officials have floated voluntary partnerships via NIST’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation, including early access agreements with Google, Microsoft, and xAI, while senior advisers explicitly distanced the administration from binding regulation in favor of industry collaboration. Prior Trump-era executive orders focused on deregulation and preempting state rules, creating precedent against sudden mandates. With only two weeks remaining, traders view the combination of internal caution, limited time, and emphasis on security testing without enforcement as the dominant factors sustaining strong consensus on No.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a federal government review process for the public release of new artificial intelligence models by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government.
Legislation or executive actions which create a group or committee responsible for overseeing artificial intelligence matters will only qualify if they explicitly create a qualifying review process.
Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government.
Legislation or executive actions which create a group or committee responsible for overseeing artificial intelligence matters will only qualify if they explicitly create a qualifying review process.
Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市場開放時間： May 4, 2026, 7:47 PM ET
交易量
$62,961結束日期
2026-05-31市場開放時間
May 4, 2026, 7:47 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a federal government review process for the public release of new artificial intelligence models by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government.
Legislation or executive actions which create a group or committee responsible for overseeing artificial intelligence matters will only qualify if they explicitly create a qualifying review process.
Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Recent White House deliberations around potential pre-deployment oversight for frontier AI models have fueled market positioning, yet the absence of any formal executive order through mid-May keeps the implied probability of a mandatory federal review by May 31 firmly at 88.5% for No. Officials have floated voluntary partnerships via NIST’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation, including early access agreements with Google, Microsoft, and xAI, while senior advisers explicitly distanced the administration from binding regulation in favor of industry collaboration. Prior Trump-era executive orders focused on deregulation and preempting state rules, creating precedent against sudden mandates. With only two weeks remaining, traders view the combination of internal caution, limited time, and emphasis on security testing without enforcement as the dominant factors sustaining strong consensus on No.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates, authorizes, or directs a federal government review process for the public release of new artificial intelligence models by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government.
Legislation or executive actions which create a group or committee responsible for overseeing artificial intelligence matters will only qualify if they explicitly create a qualifying review process.
Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A qualifying action must create a federal process for reviewing or approving the public release of new artificial intelligence models. A qualifying review process may apply to artificial intelligence models generally, only to models meeting specified criteria (e.g.capability, safety, cybersecurity, national-security, or other risk-based criteria), or to models selected for review at the discretion of the federal government.
Legislation or executive actions which create a group or committee responsible for overseeing artificial intelligence matters will only qualify if they explicitly create a qualifying review process.
Non-binding statements, proposals, unconfirmed reports, or federal review of artificial intelligence models solely for government procurement or internal government use will not qualify.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
交易量
$62,961結束日期
2026-05-31市場開放時間
May 4, 2026, 7:47 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Recent White House deliberations around potential pre-deployment oversight for frontier AI models have fueled market positioning, yet the absence of any formal executive order through mid-May keeps the implied probability of a mandatory federal review by May 31 firmly at 88.5% for No. Officials have floated voluntary partnerships via NIST’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation, including early access agreements with Google, Microsoft, and xAI, while senior advisers explicitly distanced the administration from binding regulation in favor of industry collaboration. Prior Trump-era executive orders focused on deregulation and preempting state rules, creating precedent against sudden mandates. With only two weeks remaining, traders view the combination of internal caution, limited time, and emphasis on security testing without enforcement as the dominant factors sustaining strong consensus on No.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions