The tightly clustered market odds around 49-50% across two dozen AI labs reflect intense competition and rapid iteration in mathematical reasoning benchmarks like LiveBench. No single company has established a durable edge, as frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, and others continue to trade incremental gains through improved chain-of-thought reasoning, test-time compute scaling, and curated math-heavy training data. Chinese labs in particular have narrowed historical gaps with efficient architectures and large-scale synthetic data, while Western labs emphasize agentic workflows and hybrid symbolic-neural approaches. Key swing factors over the next month include any late-August model updates or capability demonstrations that could shift leaderboard positions before resolution. Traders appear to view the outcome as highly path-dependent on the final training runs and evaluation snapshots.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Moonshot 50%
Nvidia 50%
Anthropic 49%
OpenAI 49%

Moonshot
50%

Nvidia
50%

Anthropic
49%

OpenAI
49%

Meta
33%

Alibaba
33%

Baidu
33%

Z.ai
33%

Meituan
24%

23%

Xiaomi
23%

SpaceXAI
23%

DeepSeek
23%

Amazon
23%

ByteDance
23%

Thinky
23%

MiniMax
23%

Mistral
18%

Tencent
18%

StepFun
18%

Microsoft
18%
Moonshot 50%
Nvidia 50%
Anthropic 49%
OpenAI 49%

Moonshot
50%

Nvidia
50%

Anthropic
49%

OpenAI
49%

Meta
33%

Alibaba
33%

Baidu
33%

Z.ai
33%

Meituan
24%

23%

Xiaomi
23%

SpaceXAI
23%

DeepSeek
23%

Amazon
23%

ByteDance
23%

Thinky
23%

MiniMax
23%

Mistral
18%

Tencent
18%

StepFun
18%

Microsoft
18%
Results from the “Mathematics” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Mathematics, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Mathematics,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
市場開放時間: Jul 29, 2026, 6:27 PM ET
Results from the “Mathematics” column of the leaderboard at https://livebench.ai/#/?cats=Mathematics, with the latest available LiveBench release selected and the category set to “Mathematics,” will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ranked according to the specified score, with higher scores ranked ahead of lower scores. If two or more models have exactly the same score as displayed on the leaderboard, the model with the lower listed "cost per successful task" will be ranked ahead. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact score and cost per successful task, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the LiveBench leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to “Other.”
The tightly clustered market odds around 49-50% across two dozen AI labs reflect intense competition and rapid iteration in mathematical reasoning benchmarks like LiveBench. No single company has established a durable edge, as frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, and others continue to trade incremental gains through improved chain-of-thought reasoning, test-time compute scaling, and curated math-heavy training data. Chinese labs in particular have narrowed historical gaps with efficient architectures and large-scale synthetic data, while Western labs emphasize agentic workflows and hybrid symbolic-neural approaches. Key swing factors over the next month include any late-August model updates or capability demonstrations that could shift leaderboard positions before resolution. Traders appear to view the outcome as highly path-dependent on the final training runs and evaluation snapshots.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions