President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$105,262 交易量
2026-05-31
Marjorie Taylor Greene
66%
Nicolás Maduro
39%
弗里德里希·默茨
32%
Tucker Carlson
30%
Megyn Kelly
21%
Zohran Mamdani
19%
凯特兰·柯林斯
17%
Keir Starmer
15%
Alex Jones
13%
埃马纽埃尔·马克龙
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
穆罕默德·本·萨勒曼
7%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
4%
Elon Musk
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
J.D. Vance
2%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$105,262 交易量
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,569 交易量
66%
Nicolás Maduro
$6,396 交易量
39%
弗里德里希·默茨
$1,791 交易量
32%
Tucker Carlson
$4,451 交易量
30%
Megyn Kelly
$3,417 交易量
21%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 交易量
19%
凯特兰·柯林斯
$262 交易量
17%
Keir Starmer
$2,925 交易量
15%
Alex Jones
$87 交易量
13%
埃马纽埃尔·马克龙
$583 交易量
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 交易量
10%
穆罕默德·本·萨勒曼
$130 交易量
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,436 交易量
5%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$452 交易量
4%
Elon Musk
$1,468 交易量
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 交易量
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,404 交易量
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,687 交易量
2%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 交易量
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 交易量
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
交易量
$105,262结束日期
2026-05-31市场开放时间
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$105,262结束日期
2026-05-31市场开放时间
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump has maintained a consistent pattern of public criticism toward media figures, Democrats, and other opponents through recent press interactions and social media. On May 12 he described a reporter questioning White House ballroom expansion costs as “dumb,” while around May 15 he introduced and explained the term “Dumocrats” on Fox News to characterize his political adversaries. These statements fit his established approach of using pointed language during official events and communications. With the May 31 resolution window opening in the coming days, traders are watching scheduled appearances, briefings, and diplomatic activities that could prompt additional direct remarks. Historical patterns of frequent rhetoric in short timeframes provide context for assessing likely targets among journalists, lawmakers, or other public figures.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题