Skip to main content

Um in den USA zu traden, geh zu polymarket.us

icon for Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?
Geopolitik·China

Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?

icon for Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?
Geopolitik·China

Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?

Ja

4% Chance
Polymarket

$210,425 Vol.

Ja

4% Chance
Polymarket

$210,425 Vol.

This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and the United States between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and United States military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not. Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the Chinese military and the United States Coast Guard is part of the United States military. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Ongoing diplomatic engagement between the US and China, including planned leader summits and preparatory talks ahead of Xi Jinping’s September 2026 visit to Washington, supports trader consensus against a direct military clash before 2027. Strengthened bilateral military-to-military communications and a trade truce further reduce near-term escalation risks in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea. The most recent development, US confirmation of orbital weapons on September 15, prompted Chinese warnings against space militarization but has not triggered kinetic confrontation. Economic interdependence and avoidance of direct force remain stabilizing factors. Unforeseen incidents, such as a major Taiwan crisis, South China Sea collision, or rapid escalation from space or proxy activities, could still shift probabilities within the resolution window.

This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and the United States between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".

A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and United States military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.

Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the Chinese military and the United States Coast Guard is part of the United States military.

The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and the United States between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and United States military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not. Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the Chinese military and the United States Coast Guard is part of the United States military. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$210,425
Enddatum
1. Jan. 2027
Markt eröffnet
Jan 14, 2026, 2:14 PM ET

Abwickler

0x65070BE91...
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and the United States between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and United States military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not. Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the Chinese military and the United States Coast Guard is part of the United States military. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Ongoing diplomatic engagement between the US and China, including planned leader summits and preparatory talks ahead of Xi Jinping’s September 2026 visit to Washington, supports trader consensus against a direct military clash before 2027. Strengthened bilateral military-to-military communications and a trade truce further reduce near-term escalation risks in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea. The most recent development, US confirmation of orbital weapons on September 15, prompted Chinese warnings against space militarization but has not triggered kinetic confrontation. Economic interdependence and avoidance of direct force remain stabilizing factors. Unforeseen incidents, such as a major Taiwan crisis, South China Sea collision, or rapid escalation from space or proxy activities, could still shift probabilities within the resolution window.

This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and the United States between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".

A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and United States military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.

Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the Chinese military and the United States Coast Guard is part of the United States military.

The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of China (People's Republic of China) and the United States between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between Chinese and United States military forces. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not. Note: the China Coast Guard (CCG) is part of the Chinese military and the United States Coast Guard is part of the United States military. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$210,425
Enddatum
1. Jan. 2027
Markt eröffnet
Jan 14, 2026, 2:14 PM ET

Abwickler

0x65070BE91...

Verwandte

icon for China x Philippinen militärische Auseinandersetzung vor 2027?

China x Philippinen militärische Auseinandersetzung vor 2027?

28%
Ja
icon for Militärischer Zusammenstoß zwischen China und Japan vor 2027?

Militärischer Zusammenstoß zwischen China und Japan vor 2027?

6%
Ja
icon for Militärischer Zusammenstoß zwischen China und Taiwan vor 2027?

Militärischer Zusammenstoß zwischen China und Taiwan vor 2027?

6%
Ja

Vorsicht bei externen Links.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

„Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" ist ein Prognosemarkt auf Polymarket mit 2 möglichen Ergebnissen, bei dem Händler Anteile auf Basis ihrer Einschätzung kaufen und verkaufen. Das aktuell führende Ergebnis ist „Militärischer Zusammenstoß zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" mit 4%. Die Preise spiegeln Echtzeit-Wahrscheinlichkeiten der Community wider. Ein Anteilspreis von 4¢ bedeutet, dass der Markt diesem Ergebnis eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 4% zuweist. Diese Quoten ändern sich laufend, wenn Händler auf neue Entwicklungen reagieren. Anteile am richtigen Ergebnis können bei Marktauflösung für jeweils $1 eingelöst werden.

Stand heute hat „Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" ein Gesamthandelsvolumen von $210.4K generiert, seit der Markt am Jan 14, 2026 gestartet wurde. Dieses Aktivitätsniveau spiegelt starkes Engagement der Polymarket-Community wider und stellt sicher, dass die aktuellen Quoten von einem breiten Pool an Marktteilnehmern geprägt werden. Sie können Live-Preisbewegungen verfolgen und direkt auf dieser Seite auf jedes Ergebnis handeln.

Um auf „Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" zu handeln, durchsuchen Sie die 2 verfügbaren Ergebnisse auf dieser Seite. Jedes Ergebnis zeigt einen aktuellen Preis, der die implizierte Wahrscheinlichkeit des Marktes darstellt. Um eine Position einzunehmen, wählen Sie das Ergebnis, das Sie für am wahrscheinlichsten halten, wählen Sie „Ja" um dafür oder „Nein" um dagegen zu handeln, geben Sie Ihren Betrag ein und klicken Sie auf „Handeln". Liegt Ihr gewähltes Ergebnis bei Marktauflösung richtig, zahlen Ihre „Ja"-Anteile jeweils $1 aus. Liegt es falsch, zahlen sie $0. Sie können Ihre Anteile auch jederzeit vor der Auflösung verkaufen.

Dies ist ein offener Markt. Der aktuelle Spitzenreiter für „Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" ist „Militärischer Zusammenstoß zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" mit nur 4%. Da kein Ergebnis eine starke Mehrheit hat, sehen Händler dies als hochgradig unsicher an, was einzigartige Handelsmöglichkeiten bieten kann. Diese Quoten werden in Echtzeit aktualisiert – speichern Sie diese Seite als Lesezeichen.

Die Auflösungsregeln für „Militärkonflikt zwischen den USA und China vor 2027?" definieren genau, was passieren muss, damit jedes Ergebnis als Gewinner erklärt wird – einschließlich der offiziellen Datenquellen zur Bestimmung des Ergebnisses. Sie können die vollständigen Auflösungskriterien im Abschnitt „Regeln" auf dieser Seite über den Kommentaren einsehen. Wir empfehlen, die Regeln vor dem Handeln sorgfältig zu lesen, da sie die genauen Bedingungen, Sonderfälle und Quellen festlegen.