President Trump's arrival in Beijing on May 13 for a high-stakes bilateral summit with Xi Jinping has anchored trader consensus at 96.5% for no public insult this week, reflecting his recent praise of Xi as a "great gentleman," "intelligent man," and leader with whom he maintains a "great relationship" despite policy frictions on trade, Taiwan, and the Iran conflict. Amid red-carpet diplomacy—including planned tête-à-têtes on AI, fentanyl, and Strait of Hormuz access—no insults have materialized, aligning with historical patterns of personal rapport during summits. Realistic shifts could arise from summit breakdowns, leaked concessions, or post-meeting Truth Social posts amid escalation signals, though traders price such risks as minimal given the ongoing de-escalation focus.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado¿Trump insultará a Xi esta semana?
¿Trump insultará a Xi esta semana?
Sí
NUEVO
$60,972 Vol.
NUEVO
$60,972 Vol.
22 may 2026
Sí
NUEVO
$60,972 Vol.
NUEVO
$60,972 Vol.
22 may 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks XI Jinping personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and May 17, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's arrival in Beijing on May 13 for a high-stakes bilateral summit with Xi Jinping has anchored trader consensus at 96.5% for no public insult this week, reflecting his recent praise of Xi as a "great gentleman," "intelligent man," and leader with whom he maintains a "great relationship" despite policy frictions on trade, Taiwan, and the Iran conflict. Amid red-carpet diplomacy—including planned tête-à-têtes on AI, fentanyl, and Strait of Hormuz access—no insults have materialized, aligning with historical patterns of personal rapport during summits. Realistic shifts could arise from summit breakdowns, leaked concessions, or post-meeting Truth Social posts amid escalation signals, though traders price such risks as minimal given the ongoing de-escalation focus.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks XI Jinping personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and May 17, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: May 11, 2026, 4:18 PM ET
Volumen
$60,972Fecha de finalización
22 may 2026Mercado abierto
May 11, 2026, 4:18 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks XI Jinping personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and May 17, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's arrival in Beijing on May 13 for a high-stakes bilateral summit with Xi Jinping has anchored trader consensus at 96.5% for no public insult this week, reflecting his recent praise of Xi as a "great gentleman," "intelligent man," and leader with whom he maintains a "great relationship" despite policy frictions on trade, Taiwan, and the Iran conflict. Amid red-carpet diplomacy—including planned tête-à-têtes on AI, fentanyl, and Strait of Hormuz access—no insults have materialized, aligning with historical patterns of personal rapport during summits. Realistic shifts could arise from summit breakdowns, leaked concessions, or post-meeting Truth Social posts amid escalation signals, though traders price such risks as minimal given the ongoing de-escalation focus.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks XI Jinping personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and May 17, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$60,972Fecha de finalización
22 may 2026Mercado abierto
May 11, 2026, 4:18 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's arrival in Beijing on May 13 for a high-stakes bilateral summit with Xi Jinping has anchored trader consensus at 96.5% for no public insult this week, reflecting his recent praise of Xi as a "great gentleman," "intelligent man," and leader with whom he maintains a "great relationship" despite policy frictions on trade, Taiwan, and the Iran conflict. Amid red-carpet diplomacy—including planned tête-à-têtes on AI, fentanyl, and Strait of Hormuz access—no insults have materialized, aligning with historical patterns of personal rapport during summits. Realistic shifts could arise from summit breakdowns, leaked concessions, or post-meeting Truth Social posts amid escalation signals, though traders price such risks as minimal given the ongoing de-escalation focus.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes