President Donald Trump has continued his pattern of direct public criticism toward journalists and media outlets in mid-September 2026, including calling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" during an Oval Office exchange and announcing restrictions on access for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage he described as negative. These exchanges occurred amid broader tensions with the press, prior remarks targeting figures such as ABC's Rachel Scott, and comments on foreign policy matters including Iran. With midterm elections approaching and scheduled diplomatic engagements, additional public statements or press interactions in the final days of September could shape outcomes in markets tracking specific individuals or institutions.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour$137,850 Vol.
30 sept. 2026
Mark Carney
78%
Tucker Carlson
68%
Jon Ossoff
70%
Kathy Hochul
50%
Hillary Clinton
52%
Zohran Mamdani
30%
Jimmy Kimmel
48%
Elon Musk
39%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
27%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
34%
Andy Burnham
31%
Candace Owens
31%
Emmanuel Macron
14%
Jerome Powell
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
8%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Pape Léon XIV
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
Mohammed ben Salmane
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Vladimir Poutine
1%
Melania Trump
19%
Megyn Kelly
41%
Alex Jones
46%
Ilhan Omar
56%
Letitia James
60%
Elizabeth Warren
46%
Adam Schiff
41%
$137,850 Vol.
Mark Carney
$5,396 Vol.
78%
Tucker Carlson
$3,227 Vol.
68%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Vol.
70%
Kathy Hochul
$2,309 Vol.
50%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 Vol.
52%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,510 Vol.
30%
Jimmy Kimmel
$923 Vol.
48%
Elon Musk
$170 Vol.
39%
Friedrich Merz
$2,496 Vol.
27%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$249 Vol.
27%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,525 Vol.
34%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Vol.
31%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Vol.
31%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 Vol.
14%
Jerome Powell
$2,136 Vol.
12%
Pam Bondi
$263 Vol.
10%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,642 Vol.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Vol.
8%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
28%
Pape Léon XIV
$1,386 Vol.
6%
Kevin Warsh
$77,433 Vol.
6%
Mohammed ben Salmane
$440 Vol.
4%
Xi Jinping
$2,189 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$1,542 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
2%
Vladimir Poutine
$2,727 Vol.
1%
Melania Trump
$101 Vol.
19%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Vol.
41%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
46%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Vol.
56%
Letitia James
$747 Vol.
60%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
46%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
41%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has continued his pattern of direct public criticism toward journalists and media outlets in mid-September 2026, including calling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" during an Oval Office exchange and announcing restrictions on access for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage he described as negative. These exchanges occurred amid broader tensions with the press, prior remarks targeting figures such as ABC's Rachel Scott, and comments on foreign policy matters including Iran. With midterm elections approaching and scheduled diplomatic engagements, additional public statements or press interactions in the final days of September could shape outcomes in markets tracking specific individuals or institutions.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Marché ouvert : Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volume
$137,850Date de fin
30 sept. 2026Marché ouvert
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRésolveur
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump has continued his pattern of direct public criticism toward journalists and media outlets in mid-September 2026, including calling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" during an Oval Office exchange and announcing restrictions on access for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage he described as negative. These exchanges occurred amid broader tensions with the press, prior remarks targeting figures such as ABC's Rachel Scott, and comments on foreign policy matters including Iran. With midterm elections approaching and scheduled diplomatic engagements, additional public statements or press interactions in the final days of September could shape outcomes in markets tracking specific individuals or institutions.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$137,850Date de fin
30 sept. 2026Marché ouvert
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRésolveur
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump has continued his pattern of direct public criticism toward journalists and media outlets in mid-September 2026, including calling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" during an Oval Office exchange and announcing restrictions on access for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico over coverage he described as negative. These exchanges occurred amid broader tensions with the press, prior remarks targeting figures such as ABC's Rachel Scott, and comments on foreign policy matters including Iran. With midterm elections approaching and scheduled diplomatic engagements, additional public statements or press interactions in the final days of September could shape outcomes in markets tracking specific individuals or institutions.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes