Intense US-China strategic rivalry and explicit rejection of slowdowns by senior officials drive the 94% market-implied probability against an agreement to pace the AI frontier this year. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has stated the US “can’t pause” because China will not, while President Trump has framed AI as a winner-take-all contest. Beijing interprets American calls for restraint as attempts to preserve dominance and has accused US firms of coordinated fearmongering, even as both nations report rapid capability gains—Chinese models narrowing gaps via distillation despite export controls. Upcoming Trump-Xi talks may address narrow safety issues like AI-directed cyberattacks, yet deep mutual distrust and incentives to maintain or extend leads make a verifiable pacing pact highly improbable absent major new incidents.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日はい
はい
An AI pacing agreement means an agreement under which both governments commit to at least one of the following for AI developers within their jurisdictions: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Both governments must announce their acceptance of the agreement. A joint statement will qualify, as will separate official statements from each government that, taken together, confirm acceptance of the agreement. A statement by one government that the other does not confirm, and statements that reference ongoing negotiations, a prospective agreement, or an intention to cooperate without confirming acceptance of an agreement, will not qualify. A multilateral agreement will qualify, provided both the United States and China are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above. Qualifying announcements must come from an authorized agency or representative of the relevant country acting in an official capacity.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, signed, ratified, later modified or withdrawn from, or ever implemented. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States and China; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
マーケット開始日: Sep 14, 2026, 4:40 PM ET
リゾルバー
0x65070BE91...An AI pacing agreement means an agreement under which both governments commit to at least one of the following for AI developers within their jurisdictions: conditioning the training, releasing, or deploying AI models on safety requirements; capping the computing power used to train AI models; limiting the rate or extent to which AI systems autonomously train or improve more capable AI systems (recursive self-improvement); or otherwise pausing or slowing the training or release of AI models.
Both governments must announce their acceptance of the agreement. A joint statement will qualify, as will separate official statements from each government that, taken together, confirm acceptance of the agreement. A statement by one government that the other does not confirm, and statements that reference ongoing negotiations, a prospective agreement, or an intention to cooperate without confirming acceptance of an agreement, will not qualify. A multilateral agreement will qualify, provided both the United States and China are parties to it and it otherwise meets the requirements above. Qualifying announcements must come from an authorized agency or representative of the relevant country acting in an official capacity.
If a qualifying announcement is made within this market's timeframe, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the agreement is binding, signed, ratified, later modified or withdrawn from, or ever implemented. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States and China; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
リゾルバー
0x65070BE91...Intense US-China strategic rivalry and explicit rejection of slowdowns by senior officials drive the 94% market-implied probability against an agreement to pace the AI frontier this year. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has stated the US “can’t pause” because China will not, while President Trump has framed AI as a winner-take-all contest. Beijing interprets American calls for restraint as attempts to preserve dominance and has accused US firms of coordinated fearmongering, even as both nations report rapid capability gains—Chinese models narrowing gaps via distillation despite export controls. Upcoming Trump-Xi talks may address narrow safety issues like AI-directed cyberattacks, yet deep mutual distrust and incentives to maintain or extend leads make a verifiable pacing pact highly improbable absent major new incidents.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日


外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問