Trump’s established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists—particularly female reporters pressing him on economic incentives, military policy, and media coverage—along with occasional jabs at allies and opponents continues to shape trader views on this market. In the past two weeks, he has snapped at ABC’s Rachel Scott (“you’re the worst”), dismissed other correspondents with phrases like “not you” or “stupid question,” and faulted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style while endorsing him. Broader attacks on outlets as “treasonous scum” over Iran-related reporting and references to “fake news” have also surfaced on Truth Social and at events. With the September 30 cutoff approaching amid scheduled press interactions, potential Xi Jinping engagement, and midterm-related appearances, any unscripted exchange could quickly add names to the list of targets. Traders weigh this recurring behavior against the short remaining window and the specific individuals most likely to draw fire.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano$127,060 Wol.
Sep 30, 2026
Mark Carney
78%
Tucker Carlson
60%
Candace Owens
56%
Letitia James
50%
Kathy Hochul
45%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
44%
Norah O'Donnell
43%
Elon Musk
39%
Zohran Mamdani
31%
Friedrich Merz
27%
Jerome Powell
27%
Emmanuel Macron
22%
Andy Burnham
18%
Alex Jones
16%
Benjamin Netanyahu
12%
Kevin Warsh
9%
Xi Jinping
8%
Pam Bondi
7%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Vladimir Putin
6%
Mohammed bin Salman
5%
J.D. Vance
15%
Karoline Leavitt
3%
Megyn Kelly
46%
Melania Trump
33%
Jimmy Kimmel
56%
Stephen Colbert
43%
Ilhan Omar
57%
Jon Ossoff
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
54%
Hillary Clinton
55%
Elizabeth Warren
46%
Adam Schiff
46%
$127,060 Wol.
Mark Carney
$3,450 Wol.
78%
Tucker Carlson
$2,598 Wol.
60%
Candace Owens
$2,885 Wol.
56%
Letitia James
$493 Wol.
50%
Kathy Hochul
$2,172 Wol.
45%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,505 Wol.
44%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Wol.
43%
Elon Musk
$113 Wol.
39%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,477 Wol.
31%
Friedrich Merz
$2,097 Wol.
27%
Jerome Powell
$1,759 Wol.
27%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,279 Wol.
22%
Andy Burnham
$3,064 Wol.
18%
Alex Jones
$204 Wol.
16%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,615 Wol.
12%
Kevin Warsh
$72,547 Wol.
9%
Xi Jinping
$1,896 Wol.
8%
Pam Bondi
$250 Wol.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,356 Wol.
6%
Vladimir Putin
$2,528 Wol.
6%
Mohammed bin Salman
$408 Wol.
5%
J.D. Vance
$1,500 Wol.
15%
Karoline Leavitt
$292 Wol.
3%
Megyn Kelly
$377 Wol.
46%
Melania Trump
$95 Wol.
33%
Jimmy Kimmel
$881 Wol.
56%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Wol.
43%
Ilhan Omar
$295 Wol.
57%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Wol.
50%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$211 Wol.
54%
Hillary Clinton
$1,966 Wol.
55%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Wol.
46%
Adam Schiff
$61 Wol.
46%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists—particularly female reporters pressing him on economic incentives, military policy, and media coverage—along with occasional jabs at allies and opponents continues to shape trader views on this market. In the past two weeks, he has snapped at ABC’s Rachel Scott (“you’re the worst”), dismissed other correspondents with phrases like “not you” or “stupid question,” and faulted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style while endorsing him. Broader attacks on outlets as “treasonous scum” over Iran-related reporting and references to “fake news” have also surfaced on Truth Social and at events. With the September 30 cutoff approaching amid scheduled press interactions, potential Xi Jinping engagement, and midterm-related appearances, any unscripted exchange could quickly add names to the list of targets. Traders weigh this recurring behavior against the short remaining window and the specific individuals most likely to draw fire.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Rynek otwarty: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Wolumen
$127,060Data zakończenia
Sep 30, 2026Rynek otwarty
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists—particularly female reporters pressing him on economic incentives, military policy, and media coverage—along with occasional jabs at allies and opponents continues to shape trader views on this market. In the past two weeks, he has snapped at ABC’s Rachel Scott (“you’re the worst”), dismissed other correspondents with phrases like “not you” or “stupid question,” and faulted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style while endorsing him. Broader attacks on outlets as “treasonous scum” over Iran-related reporting and references to “fake news” have also surfaced on Truth Social and at events. With the September 30 cutoff approaching amid scheduled press interactions, potential Xi Jinping engagement, and midterm-related appearances, any unscripted exchange could quickly add names to the list of targets. Traders weigh this recurring behavior against the short remaining window and the specific individuals most likely to draw fire.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Wolumen
$127,060Data zakończenia
Sep 30, 2026Rynek otwarty
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x65070BE91...Trump’s established pattern of directing public criticism at journalists—particularly female reporters pressing him on economic incentives, military policy, and media coverage—along with occasional jabs at allies and opponents continues to shape trader views on this market. In the past two weeks, he has snapped at ABC’s Rachel Scott (“you’re the worst”), dismissed other correspondents with phrases like “not you” or “stupid question,” and faulted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and presentation style while endorsing him. Broader attacks on outlets as “treasonous scum” over Iran-related reporting and references to “fake news” have also surfaced on Truth Social and at events. With the September 30 cutoff approaching amid scheduled press interactions, potential Xi Jinping engagement, and midterm-related appearances, any unscripted exchange could quickly add names to the list of targets. Traders weigh this recurring behavior against the short remaining window and the specific individuals most likely to draw fire.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania