A federal appeals court ruling on August 7, 2026, ordered a halt to above-ground construction on the $400 million White House ballroom project absent congressional appropriations, citing limits on executive authority and siding with historic preservation challenges. The panel stayed its 2-1 decision for two weeks, explicitly allowing the Trump administration time to seek Supreme Court relief. This development has positioned the high court as the immediate arbiter in a separation-of-powers dispute over White House renovations, funding requirements, and National Park Service compliance. Traders appear to assign the 62.5% implied probability for a favorable SCOTUS outcome by September 30 to the administration’s track record on emergency stays, the project’s advanced status, and the two-week window for expedited review, while recognizing risks from congressional opposition and statutory interpretation questions. Upcoming deadlines around the stay expiration and any emergency docket filings will likely influence further shifts in consensus.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · ОновленоWill SCOTUS let Trump build the White House ballroom by September 30?
Will SCOTUS let Trump build the White House ballroom by September 30?
63% шанс
НОВЕ
НОВЕ
Sep 30, 2026
63% шанс
НОВЕ
НОВЕ
Sep 30, 2026
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.A federal appeals court ruling on August 7, 2026, ordered a halt to above-ground construction on the $400 million White House ballroom project absent congressional appropriations, citing limits on executive authority and siding with historic preservation challenges. The panel stayed its 2-1 decision for two weeks, explicitly allowing the Trump administration time to seek Supreme Court relief. This development has positioned the high court as the immediate arbiter in a separation-of-powers dispute over White House renovations, funding requirements, and National Park Service compliance. Traders appear to assign the 62.5% implied probability for a favorable SCOTUS outcome by September 30 to the administration’s track record on emergency stays, the project’s advanced status, and the two-week window for expedited review, while recognizing risks from congressional opposition and statutory interpretation questions. Upcoming deadlines around the stay expiration and any emergency docket filings will likely influence further shifts in consensus.
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Ринок відкрито: Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ET
Обсяг
$912Дата завершення
Sep 30, 2026Ринок відкрито
Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.A federal appeals court ruling on August 7, 2026, ordered a halt to above-ground construction on the $400 million White House ballroom project absent congressional appropriations, citing limits on executive authority and siding with historic preservation challenges. The panel stayed its 2-1 decision for two weeks, explicitly allowing the Trump administration time to seek Supreme Court relief. This development has positioned the high court as the immediate arbiter in a separation-of-powers dispute over White House renovations, funding requirements, and National Park Service compliance. Traders appear to assign the 62.5% implied probability for a favorable SCOTUS outcome by September 30 to the administration’s track record on emergency stays, the project’s advanced status, and the two-week window for expedited review, while recognizing risks from congressional opposition and statutory interpretation questions. Upcoming deadlines around the stay expiration and any emergency docket filings will likely influence further shifts in consensus.
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Обсяг
$912Дата завершення
Sep 30, 2026Ринок відкрито
Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...A federal appeals court ruling on August 7, 2026, ordered a halt to above-ground construction on the $400 million White House ballroom project absent congressional appropriations, citing limits on executive authority and siding with historic preservation challenges. The panel stayed its 2-1 decision for two weeks, explicitly allowing the Trump administration time to seek Supreme Court relief. This development has positioned the high court as the immediate arbiter in a separation-of-powers dispute over White House renovations, funding requirements, and National Park Service compliance. Traders appear to assign the 62.5% implied probability for a favorable SCOTUS outcome by September 30 to the administration’s track record on emergency stays, the project’s advanced status, and the two-week window for expedited review, while recognizing risks from congressional opposition and statutory interpretation questions. Upcoming deadlines around the stay expiration and any emergency docket filings will likely influence further shifts in consensus.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання