The Trump administration’s August 14 emergency application to the Supreme Court for a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling forms the central driver of trader sentiment. That panel upheld a district court injunction halting above-ground ballroom construction on the former East Wing site, holding that the project requires congressional approval rather than unilateral executive action. Justices must weigh separation-of-powers claims and historic-preservation concerns against administration arguments that the integrated security complex serves national-security needs. With Chief Justice Roberts having set an expedited response deadline and the injunction potentially taking effect in mid-August, the closely balanced 51% probability reflects uncertainty over whether the Court will grant interim relief in time for work to resume and reach substantial completion by the September 30 resolution date. A denial or delayed order would likely shift odds sharply toward “No,” while a prompt stay could reinforce the current equilibrium.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado¿Dejará SCOTUS que Trump construya el salón de baile de la Casa Blanca antes del 30 de septiembre?
¿Dejará SCOTUS que Trump construya el salón de baile de la Casa Blanca antes del 30 de septiembre?
Sí
51% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
30 sep 2026
Sí
51% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
30 sep 2026
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The Trump administration’s August 14 emergency application to the Supreme Court for a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling forms the central driver of trader sentiment. That panel upheld a district court injunction halting above-ground ballroom construction on the former East Wing site, holding that the project requires congressional approval rather than unilateral executive action. Justices must weigh separation-of-powers claims and historic-preservation concerns against administration arguments that the integrated security complex serves national-security needs. With Chief Justice Roberts having set an expedited response deadline and the injunction potentially taking effect in mid-August, the closely balanced 51% probability reflects uncertainty over whether the Court will grant interim relief in time for work to resume and reach substantial completion by the September 30 resolution date. A denial or delayed order would likely shift odds sharply toward “No,” while a prompt stay could reinforce the current equilibrium.
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado abierto: Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ET
Volumen
$2,229Fecha de finalización
30 sep 2026Mercado abierto
Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The Trump administration’s August 14 emergency application to the Supreme Court for a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling forms the central driver of trader sentiment. That panel upheld a district court injunction halting above-ground ballroom construction on the former East Wing site, holding that the project requires congressional approval rather than unilateral executive action. Justices must weigh separation-of-powers claims and historic-preservation concerns against administration arguments that the integrated security complex serves national-security needs. With Chief Justice Roberts having set an expedited response deadline and the injunction potentially taking effect in mid-August, the closely balanced 51% probability reflects uncertainty over whether the Court will grant interim relief in time for work to resume and reach substantial completion by the September 30 resolution date. A denial or delayed order would likely shift odds sharply toward “No,” while a prompt stay could reinforce the current equilibrium.
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Volumen
$2,229Fecha de finalización
30 sep 2026Mercado abierto
Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Trump administration’s August 14 emergency application to the Supreme Court for a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling forms the central driver of trader sentiment. That panel upheld a district court injunction halting above-ground ballroom construction on the former East Wing site, holding that the project requires congressional approval rather than unilateral executive action. Justices must weigh separation-of-powers claims and historic-preservation concerns against administration arguments that the integrated security complex serves national-security needs. With Chief Justice Roberts having set an expedited response deadline and the injunction potentially taking effect in mid-August, the closely balanced 51% probability reflects uncertainty over whether the Court will grant interim relief in time for work to resume and reach substantial completion by the September 30 resolution date. A denial or delayed order would likely shift odds sharply toward “No,” while a prompt stay could reinforce the current equilibrium.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes