**Trader consensus on "No" at 96.4% reflects Brazil's unbroken historical record: the Senate has never removed an STF justice via impeachment despite repeated petitions, especially during periods of intense polarization.** The process demands a high procedural bar, typically involving Senate approval by a two-thirds supermajority after review by the Prosecutor General or designated committee, which has consistently shielded the court. Recent developments, including a 2026 congressional CPI report recommending proceedings against justices such as Gilmar Mendes, Alexandre de Moraes, and Dias Toffoli over alleged procedural issues, and STF efforts to narrow standing for complaints, have not altered this pattern. Institutional protections, cross-party legislative caution, and the absence of sufficient votes sustain the current pricing. A narrow window for change before 2027 would require a decisive post-election Senate shift enabling supermajority consensus on specific charges, though such an outcome remains structurally difficult.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於是
$82,111 交易量
$82,111 交易量
2026-12-31
是
$82,111 交易量
$82,111 交易量
2026-12-31
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any justice of the Brazil Supreme Federal Court (STF) is permanently removed from the court as a result of impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.**Trader consensus on "No" at 96.4% reflects Brazil's unbroken historical record: the Senate has never removed an STF justice via impeachment despite repeated petitions, especially during periods of intense polarization.** The process demands a high procedural bar, typically involving Senate approval by a two-thirds supermajority after review by the Prosecutor General or designated committee, which has consistently shielded the court. Recent developments, including a 2026 congressional CPI report recommending proceedings against justices such as Gilmar Mendes, Alexandre de Moraes, and Dias Toffoli over alleged procedural issues, and STF efforts to narrow standing for complaints, have not altered this pattern. Institutional protections, cross-party legislative caution, and the absence of sufficient votes sustain the current pricing. A narrow window for change before 2027 would require a decisive post-election Senate shift enabling supermajority consensus on specific charges, though such an outcome remains structurally difficult.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any justice of the Brazil Supreme Federal Court (STF) is permanently removed from the court as a result of impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市場開放時間： Jan 8, 2026, 1:14 PM ET
交易量
$82,111結束日期
2026-12-31市場開放時間
Jan 8, 2026, 1:14 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if any justice of the Brazil Supreme Federal Court (STF) is permanently removed from the court as a result of impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.**Trader consensus on "No" at 96.4% reflects Brazil's unbroken historical record: the Senate has never removed an STF justice via impeachment despite repeated petitions, especially during periods of intense polarization.** The process demands a high procedural bar, typically involving Senate approval by a two-thirds supermajority after review by the Prosecutor General or designated committee, which has consistently shielded the court. Recent developments, including a 2026 congressional CPI report recommending proceedings against justices such as Gilmar Mendes, Alexandre de Moraes, and Dias Toffoli over alleged procedural issues, and STF efforts to narrow standing for complaints, have not altered this pattern. Institutional protections, cross-party legislative caution, and the absence of sufficient votes sustain the current pricing. A narrow window for change before 2027 would require a decisive post-election Senate shift enabling supermajority consensus on specific charges, though such an outcome remains structurally difficult.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any justice of the Brazil Supreme Federal Court (STF) is permanently removed from the court as a result of impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
交易量
$82,111結束日期
2026-12-31市場開放時間
Jan 8, 2026, 1:14 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...**Trader consensus on "No" at 96.4% reflects Brazil's unbroken historical record: the Senate has never removed an STF justice via impeachment despite repeated petitions, especially during periods of intense polarization.** The process demands a high procedural bar, typically involving Senate approval by a two-thirds supermajority after review by the Prosecutor General or designated committee, which has consistently shielded the court. Recent developments, including a 2026 congressional CPI report recommending proceedings against justices such as Gilmar Mendes, Alexandre de Moraes, and Dias Toffoli over alleged procedural issues, and STF efforts to narrow standing for complaints, have not altered this pattern. Institutional protections, cross-party legislative caution, and the absence of sufficient votes sustain the current pricing. A narrow window for change before 2027 would require a decisive post-election Senate shift enabling supermajority consensus on specific charges, though such an outcome remains structurally difficult.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions