President Donald Trump’s pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts, interviews, and press exchanges has intensified focus on targets including Democratic figures, media outlets, and Republican lawmakers ahead of the May 31 deadline. Recent remarks criticizing Senator Bill Cassidy as a “disloyal disaster” and continuing attacks on Pope Leo XIV over foreign policy positions illustrate ongoing rhetorical pressure on perceived opponents. Additional statements dismissing economic concerns and labeling reporters with terms such as “dumb person” or “treasonous” reflect the administration’s direct engagement style. These developments, alongside scheduled diplomatic and legislative activity through late May, shape trader assessments of likely recipients by highlighting Trump’s preference for confronting individuals tied to election integrity, international negotiations, or institutional resistance.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$102,922 Vol.
2026/05/31
Marjorie Taylor Greene
64%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
37%
Tucker Carlson
35%
Nicolás Maduro
33%
Megyn Kelly
21%
Keir Starmer
18%
ケイトラン・コリンズ
17%
Zohran Mamdani
21%
Alex Jones
13%
エマニュエル・マクロン
12%
Pam Bondi
10%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
7%
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Benjamin Netanyahu
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Elon Musk
3%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Xi Jinping
3%
Viktor Orbán
1%
Melania Trump
1%
$102,922 Vol.
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,569 Vol.
64%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
$1,791 Vol.
37%
Tucker Carlson
$4,436 Vol.
35%
Nicolás Maduro
$4,721 Vol.
33%
Megyn Kelly
$3,383 Vol.
21%
Keir Starmer
$2,766 Vol.
18%
ケイトラン・コリンズ
$262 Vol.
17%
Zohran Mamdani
$1,792 Vol.
21%
Alex Jones
$87 Vol.
13%
エマニュエル・マクロン
$537 Vol.
12%
Pam Bondi
$460 Vol.
10%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
$130 Vol.
7%
Pope Leo XIV
$9,385 Vol.
6%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$426 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$4,441 Vol.
3%
Elon Musk
$1,468 Vol.
3%
Vladimir Putin
$1,617 Vol.
3%
Xi Jinping
$6,317 Vol.
3%
Viktor Orbán
$3,671 Vol.
1%
Melania Trump
$2,056 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts, interviews, and press exchanges has intensified focus on targets including Democratic figures, media outlets, and Republican lawmakers ahead of the May 31 deadline. Recent remarks criticizing Senator Bill Cassidy as a “disloyal disaster” and continuing attacks on Pope Leo XIV over foreign policy positions illustrate ongoing rhetorical pressure on perceived opponents. Additional statements dismissing economic concerns and labeling reporters with terms such as “dumb person” or “treasonous” reflect the administration’s direct engagement style. These developments, alongside scheduled diplomatic and legislative activity through late May, shape trader assessments of likely recipients by highlighting Trump’s preference for confronting individuals tied to election integrity, international negotiations, or institutional resistance.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ET
音量
$102,922終了日
2026/05/31マーケット開始日
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts, interviews, and press exchanges has intensified focus on targets including Democratic figures, media outlets, and Republican lawmakers ahead of the May 31 deadline. Recent remarks criticizing Senator Bill Cassidy as a “disloyal disaster” and continuing attacks on Pope Leo XIV over foreign policy positions illustrate ongoing rhetorical pressure on perceived opponents. Additional statements dismissing economic concerns and labeling reporters with terms such as “dumb person” or “treasonous” reflect the administration’s direct engagement style. These developments, alongside scheduled diplomatic and legislative activity through late May, shape trader assessments of likely recipients by highlighting Trump’s preference for confronting individuals tied to election integrity, international negotiations, or institutional resistance.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$102,922終了日
2026/05/31マーケット開始日
Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump’s pattern of public criticism through Truth Social posts, interviews, and press exchanges has intensified focus on targets including Democratic figures, media outlets, and Republican lawmakers ahead of the May 31 deadline. Recent remarks criticizing Senator Bill Cassidy as a “disloyal disaster” and continuing attacks on Pope Leo XIV over foreign policy positions illustrate ongoing rhetorical pressure on perceived opponents. Additional statements dismissing economic concerns and labeling reporters with terms such as “dumb person” or “treasonous” reflect the administration’s direct engagement style. These developments, alongside scheduled diplomatic and legislative activity through late May, shape trader assessments of likely recipients by highlighting Trump’s preference for confronting individuals tied to election integrity, international negotiations, or institutional resistance.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問