Trump's direct communication style, evident in frequent social media posts and public speeches, remains a central factor shaping trader views on whether he will issue pointed public criticisms. Recent addresses and statements on policy matters have included sharp references to political opponents and institutional figures, consistent with patterns observed during his current term. Upcoming scheduled events such as rallies and media appearances could provide additional platforms for similar expressions. Market participants weigh these ongoing dynamics against historical precedents of his rhetorical approach, recognizing that such outcomes often hinge on immediate political developments and individual events rather than fixed trends.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$509,566 Vol.
2026/05/31
May 18
94%
May 19
94%
May 20
91%
May 21
90%
May 22
93%
May 23
91%
May 24
90%
May 25
91%
May 26
91%
May 27
89%
May 28
91%
May 29
91%
May 30
91%
May 31
90%
$509,566 Vol.
May 18
$7,967 Vol.
94%
May 19
$2,329 Vol.
94%
May 20
$1,816 Vol.
91%
May 21
$749 Vol.
90%
May 22
$1,084 Vol.
93%
May 23
$154 Vol.
91%
May 24
$497 Vol.
90%
May 25
$626 Vol.
91%
May 26
$735 Vol.
91%
May 27
$1,035 Vol.
89%
May 28
$523 Vol.
91%
May 29
$387 Vol.
91%
May 30
$97 Vol.
91%
May 31
$399 Vol.
90%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's direct communication style, evident in frequent social media posts and public speeches, remains a central factor shaping trader views on whether he will issue pointed public criticisms. Recent addresses and statements on policy matters have included sharp references to political opponents and institutional figures, consistent with patterns observed during his current term. Upcoming scheduled events such as rallies and media appearances could provide additional platforms for similar expressions. Market participants weigh these ongoing dynamics against historical precedents of his rhetorical approach, recognizing that such outcomes often hinge on immediate political developments and individual events rather than fixed trends.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
音量
$509,566終了日
2026/05/31マーケット開始日
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...提案された結果: Yes
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's direct communication style, evident in frequent social media posts and public speeches, remains a central factor shaping trader views on whether he will issue pointed public criticisms. Recent addresses and statements on policy matters have included sharp references to political opponents and institutional figures, consistent with patterns observed during his current term. Upcoming scheduled events such as rallies and media appearances could provide additional platforms for similar expressions. Market participants weigh these ongoing dynamics against historical precedents of his rhetorical approach, recognizing that such outcomes often hinge on immediate political developments and individual events rather than fixed trends.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$509,566終了日
2026/05/31マーケット開始日
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...提案された結果: Yes
異議申し立てなし
最終結果: Yes
Trump's direct communication style, evident in frequent social media posts and public speeches, remains a central factor shaping trader views on whether he will issue pointed public criticisms. Recent addresses and statements on policy matters have included sharp references to political opponents and institutional figures, consistent with patterns observed during his current term. Upcoming scheduled events such as rallies and media appearances could provide additional platforms for similar expressions. Market participants weigh these ongoing dynamics against historical precedents of his rhetorical approach, recognizing that such outcomes often hinge on immediate political developments and individual events rather than fixed trends.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問