Anthropic holds a strong 73% market-implied probability of finishing second on the arena.ai Code Arena WebDev leaderboard by end of September because its Claude Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 models maintain broad depth across agentic coding and frontend tasks, consistently placing multiple variants in the top ranks on SWE-bench Verified and related harnesses. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra launch on September 3 appears to have taken the top spot with leading scores around 1,797, shifting the hierarchy and leaving the 22% odds on OpenAI for second place. Chinese labs such as Moonshot’s Kimi-K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen variants show competitive but narrower strength in specific frontend categories, while the rest of the field trails at sub-4% odds amid limited recent model updates.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoSegundo melhor Code Arena WebDev AI Lab no final de setembro?
Segundo melhor Code Arena WebDev AI Lab no final de setembro?
Anthropic 73.2%
OpenAI 22.2%
Alibaba 3.5%
Moonshot <1%
$78,425 Vol.
$78,425 Vol.
30 set 2026
Anthropic
73%
OpenAI
22%
Alibaba
4%
Moonshot
1%
SpaceXAI
1%
Tencent
<1%
Z.ai
<1%
Meta
<1%
ByteDance
<1%
MiniMax
<1%
<1%
Xiaomi
<1%
DeepSeek
<1%
Thinky
<1%
Poolside
<1%
Mistral
<1%
Anthropic 73.2%
OpenAI 22.2%
Alibaba 3.5%
Moonshot <1%
$78,425 Vol.
$78,425 Vol.
30 set 2026
Anthropic
$17,856 Vol.
73%
OpenAI
$11,639 Vol.
22%
Alibaba
$17,542 Vol.
4%
Moonshot
$12,379 Vol.
1%
SpaceXAI
$2,537 Vol.
1%
Tencent
$1,977 Vol.
<1%
Z.ai
$2,097 Vol.
<1%
Meta
$1,709 Vol.
<1%
ByteDance
$3,054 Vol.
<1%
MiniMax
$598 Vol.
<1%
$1,766 Vol.
<1%
Xiaomi
$1,468 Vol.
<1%
DeepSeek
$1,022 Vol.
<1%
Thinky
$617 Vol.
<1%
Poolside
$1,035 Vol.
<1%
Mistral
$1,130 Vol.
<1%
This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Anthropic holds a strong 73% market-implied probability of finishing second on the arena.ai Code Arena WebDev leaderboard by end of September because its Claude Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 models maintain broad depth across agentic coding and frontend tasks, consistently placing multiple variants in the top ranks on SWE-bench Verified and related harnesses. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra launch on September 3 appears to have taken the top spot with leading scores around 1,797, shifting the hierarchy and leaving the 22% odds on OpenAI for second place. Chinese labs such as Moonshot’s Kimi-K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen variants show competitive but narrower strength in specific frontend categories, while the rest of the field trails at sub-4% odds amid limited recent model updates.
This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Mercado Aberto: Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ET
Volume
$78,425Data de Término
1 out 2026Mercado Aberto
Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ETFonte de resolução
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsResolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Anthropic holds a strong 73% market-implied probability of finishing second on the arena.ai Code Arena WebDev leaderboard by end of September because its Claude Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 models maintain broad depth across agentic coding and frontend tasks, consistently placing multiple variants in the top ranks on SWE-bench Verified and related harnesses. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra launch on September 3 appears to have taken the top spot with leading scores around 1,797, shifting the hierarchy and leaving the 22% odds on OpenAI for second place. Chinese labs such as Moonshot’s Kimi-K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen variants show competitive but narrower strength in specific frontend categories, while the rest of the field trails at sub-4% odds amid limited recent model updates.
This market will resolve according to the second-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Volume
$78,425Data de Término
1 out 2026Mercado Aberto
Jul 24, 2026, 7:45 PM ETFonte de resolução
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsResolver
0x69c47De9D...Anthropic holds a strong 73% market-implied probability of finishing second on the arena.ai Code Arena WebDev leaderboard by end of September because its Claude Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 models maintain broad depth across agentic coding and frontend tasks, consistently placing multiple variants in the top ranks on SWE-bench Verified and related harnesses. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra launch on September 3 appears to have taken the top spot with leading scores around 1,797, shifting the hierarchy and leaving the 22% odds on OpenAI for second place. Chinese labs such as Moonshot’s Kimi-K3 and Alibaba’s Qwen variants show competitive but narrower strength in specific frontend categories, while the rest of the field trails at sub-4% odds amid limited recent model updates.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions