Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-max-0902 model has secured third place on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard with an Elo score near 1681, ahead of Moonshot’s Kimi K3-max and other contenders, driving the 64.5% market-implied odds for the lab to finish third by end of September. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed first with 1800 points following its early September launch, while Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 holds second near 1758, reflecting strong agentic coding and multi-step frontend workflows evaluated through crowdsourced votes. Chinese labs continue closing gaps via cost-efficient updates and tool-use benchmarks, though trailing the top two in overall consistency. With resolution days away, any late model releases or vote shifts could still alter the final lab ranking.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoTerceiro melhor Code Arena WebDev AI Lab no final de setembro?
Terceiro melhor Code Arena WebDev AI Lab no final de setembro?
Alibaba 65%
Moonshot 19%
SpaceXAI 7.1%
OpenAI 3.3%
$46,607 Vol.
$46,607 Vol.
30 set 2026
Alibaba
65%
Moonshot
19%
SpaceXAI
7%
OpenAI
3%
ByteDance
2%
1%
MiniMax
1%
DeepSeek
1%
Z.ai
<1%
Anthropic
<1%
Poolside
<1%
Xiaomi
<1%
Tencent
<1%
Meta
<1%
Mistral
<1%
Thinky
<1%
Alibaba 65%
Moonshot 19%
SpaceXAI 7.1%
OpenAI 3.3%
$46,607 Vol.
$46,607 Vol.
30 set 2026
Alibaba
$14,701 Vol.
65%
Moonshot
$11,083 Vol.
19%
SpaceXAI
$2,515 Vol.
7%
OpenAI
$2,233 Vol.
3%
ByteDance
$1,090 Vol.
2%
$1,334 Vol.
1%
MiniMax
$568 Vol.
1%
DeepSeek
$1,240 Vol.
1%
Z.ai
$1,691 Vol.
<1%
Anthropic
$3,758 Vol.
<1%
Poolside
$1,004 Vol.
<1%
Xiaomi
$1,094 Vol.
<1%
Tencent
$1,049 Vol.
<1%
Meta
$1,427 Vol.
<1%
Mistral
$779 Vol.
<1%
Thinky
$1,040 Vol.
<1%
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-max-0902 model has secured third place on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard with an Elo score near 1681, ahead of Moonshot’s Kimi K3-max and other contenders, driving the 64.5% market-implied odds for the lab to finish third by end of September. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed first with 1800 points following its early September launch, while Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 holds second near 1758, reflecting strong agentic coding and multi-step frontend workflows evaluated through crowdsourced votes. Chinese labs continue closing gaps via cost-efficient updates and tool-use benchmarks, though trailing the top two in overall consistency. With resolution days away, any late model releases or vote shifts could still alter the final lab ranking.
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Mercado Aberto: Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ET
Volume
$46,607Data de Término
1 out 2026Mercado Aberto
Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ETFonte de resolução
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsResolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-max-0902 model has secured third place on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard with an Elo score near 1681, ahead of Moonshot’s Kimi K3-max and other contenders, driving the 64.5% market-implied odds for the lab to finish third by end of September. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed first with 1800 points following its early September launch, while Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 holds second near 1758, reflecting strong agentic coding and multi-step frontend workflows evaluated through crowdsourced votes. Chinese labs continue closing gaps via cost-efficient updates and tool-use benchmarks, though trailing the top two in overall consistency. With resolution days away, any late model releases or vote shifts could still alter the final lab ranking.
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Volume
$46,607Data de Término
1 out 2026Mercado Aberto
Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ETFonte de resolução
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsResolver
0x69c47De9D...Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-max-0902 model has secured third place on the Code Arena WebDev leaderboard with an Elo score near 1681, ahead of Moonshot’s Kimi K3-max and other contenders, driving the 64.5% market-implied odds for the lab to finish third by end of September. OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed first with 1800 points following its early September launch, while Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 holds second near 1758, reflecting strong agentic coding and multi-step frontend workflows evaluated through crowdsourced votes. Chinese labs continue closing gaps via cost-efficient updates and tool-use benchmarks, though trailing the top two in overall consistency. With resolution days away, any late model releases or vote shifts could still alter the final lab ranking.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions