The closely balanced odds around 50% reflect uncertainty over how the Supreme Court will rule on the Trump administration’s emergency application seeking a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s August injunction, which halted above-ground construction on the proposed White House ballroom pending congressional approval. The administration argues the project forms part of an integrated national security facility at the former East Wing site, while challengers cite separation-of-powers limits on unilateral executive action. Traders are weighing the Court’s historical approach to emergency stays in cases involving presidential authority over federal property against the lower court’s emphasis on appropriations requirements. A prompt ruling granting relief before September 30 could resolve the market toward Yes, whereas denial or delayed action would favor No; congressional intervention or further procedural developments could also shift the balance.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้วWill SCOTUS let Trump build the White House ballroom by September 30?
Will SCOTUS let Trump build the White House ballroom by September 30?
51% โอกาส
ใหม่
ใหม่
Sep 30, 2026
51% โอกาส
ใหม่
ใหม่
Sep 30, 2026
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The closely balanced odds around 50% reflect uncertainty over how the Supreme Court will rule on the Trump administration’s emergency application seeking a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s August injunction, which halted above-ground construction on the proposed White House ballroom pending congressional approval. The administration argues the project forms part of an integrated national security facility at the former East Wing site, while challengers cite separation-of-powers limits on unilateral executive action. Traders are weighing the Court’s historical approach to emergency stays in cases involving presidential authority over federal property against the lower court’s emphasis on appropriations requirements. A prompt ruling granting relief before September 30 could resolve the market toward Yes, whereas denial or delayed action would favor No; congressional intervention or further procedural developments could also shift the balance.
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ: Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ET
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$2,363วันสิ้นสุด
Sep 30, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.The closely balanced odds around 50% reflect uncertainty over how the Supreme Court will rule on the Trump administration’s emergency application seeking a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s August injunction, which halted above-ground construction on the proposed White House ballroom pending congressional approval. The administration argues the project forms part of an integrated national security facility at the former East Wing site, while challengers cite separation-of-powers limits on unilateral executive action. Traders are weighing the Court’s historical approach to emergency stays in cases involving presidential authority over federal property against the lower court’s emphasis on appropriations requirements. A prompt ruling granting relief before September 30 could resolve the market toward Yes, whereas denial or delayed action would favor No; congressional intervention or further procedural developments could also shift the balance.
The Supreme Court of the United States is expected to be asked to review lower-court rulings blocking construction of a new White House ballroom on the former site of the East Wing offices. As of market creation, a preliminary injunction affirmed by the D.C. Circuit blocks above-ground construction while permitting below-ground work.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by September 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the Supreme Court of the United States issues any ruling or order that has the effect of permitting construction to resume on any above-ground portion of the ballroom project. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No."
A qualifying ruling or order includes a merits decision, a stay of a lower-court injunction, or any other form of interim or permanent relief, so long as its effect is that above-ground construction is legally permitted to proceed. A ruling or order affecting only below-ground work will not qualify.
Once a qualifying ruling or order has been issued, this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of whether the ruling or order is later vacated, reversed, or superseded, and regardless of whether construction actually resumes.
This market will resolve to "No" if no qualifying ruling or order is issued by the deadline, including if the Supreme Court declines to hear the case, dismisses it, or resolves it on grounds that leave the block on above-ground construction in place. Above-ground construction becoming permitted through any mechanism other than a Supreme Court ruling or order — including congressional authorization, settlement, or dismissal of the underlying lawsuit — will not qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States (including orders published at supremecourt.gov); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
ปริมาณการซื้อขาย
$2,363วันสิ้นสุด
Sep 30, 2026ตลาดเปิดเมื่อ
Aug 7, 2026, 4:54 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The closely balanced odds around 50% reflect uncertainty over how the Supreme Court will rule on the Trump administration’s emergency application seeking a stay of the D.C. Circuit’s August injunction, which halted above-ground construction on the proposed White House ballroom pending congressional approval. The administration argues the project forms part of an integrated national security facility at the former East Wing site, while challengers cite separation-of-powers limits on unilateral executive action. Traders are weighing the Court’s historical approach to emergency stays in cases involving presidential authority over federal property against the lower court’s emphasis on appropriations requirements. A prompt ruling granting relief before September 30 could resolve the market toward Yes, whereas denial or delayed action would favor No; congressional intervention or further procedural developments could also shift the balance.
สรุปจาก AI ทดลองที่อ้างอิงข้อมูลจาก Polymarket ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำในการเทรดและไม่มีผลต่อการตัดสินตลาดนี้ · อัปเดตแล้ว
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
ระวังลิงก์ภายนอก
คำถามที่พบบ่อย