Donald Trump's communication style frequently features direct criticisms of political opponents, media personalities, and public figures through rallies, interviews, and social media posts. With the September 30 resolution window now just days away, recent statements and responses to ongoing news cycles in September 2026 have shaped trader views on likely targets. Historical patterns show such remarks often intensify during campaign periods or amid policy disputes, though no single dominant incident has emerged in the past week to consolidate probabilities. Scheduled appearances or reactions to breaking developments could still alter the field before the deadline.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено$135,643 Обс.
Sep 30, 2026
Mark Carney
82%
Jon Ossoff
75%
Tucker Carlson
75%
Candace Owens
55%
Zohran Mamdani
31%
Elon Musk
41%
Letitia James
39%
Friedrich Merz
22%
Andy Burnham
31%
Emmanuel Macron
17%
Jerome Powell
16%
Alex Jones
10%
Benjamin Netanyahu
10%
Norah O'Donnell
8%
Stephen Colbert
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Kevin Warsh
6%
Pope Leo XIV
5%
Pam Bondi
5%
Melania Trump
4%
J.D. Vance
4%
Xi Jinping
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
Vladimir Putin
2%
Megyn Kelly
46%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
55%
Jimmy Kimmel
57%
Kathy Hochul
42%
Ilhan Omar
61%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
64%
Hillary Clinton
54%
Elizabeth Warren
54%
Adam Schiff
48%
$135,643 Обс.
Mark Carney
$4,628 Обс.
82%
Jon Ossoff
$123 Обс.
75%
Tucker Carlson
$2,917 Обс.
75%
Candace Owens
$3,097 Обс.
55%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,502 Обс.
31%
Elon Musk
$163 Обс.
41%
Letitia James
$742 Обс.
39%
Friedrich Merz
$2,214 Обс.
22%
Andy Burnham
$3,715 Обс.
31%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,523 Обс.
17%
Jerome Powell
$2,078 Обс.
16%
Alex Jones
$204 Обс.
10%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,642 Обс.
10%
Norah O'Donnell
$72 Обс.
8%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Обс.
27%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Обс.
6%
Kevin Warsh
$76,892 Обс.
6%
Pope Leo XIV
$1,386 Обс.
5%
Pam Bondi
$263 Обс.
5%
Melania Trump
$101 Обс.
4%
J.D. Vance
$1,522 Обс.
4%
Xi Jinping
$2,169 Обс.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Обс.
2%
Vladimir Putin
$2,685 Обс.
2%
Megyn Kelly
$407 Обс.
46%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,515 Обс.
55%
Jimmy Kimmel
$913 Обс.
57%
Kathy Hochul
$2,198 Обс.
42%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Обс.
61%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$236 Обс.
64%
Hillary Clinton
$1,985 Обс.
54%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Обс.
54%
Adam Schiff
$61 Обс.
48%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Donald Trump's communication style frequently features direct criticisms of political opponents, media personalities, and public figures through rallies, interviews, and social media posts. With the September 30 resolution window now just days away, recent statements and responses to ongoing news cycles in September 2026 have shaped trader views on likely targets. Historical patterns show such remarks often intensify during campaign periods or amid policy disputes, though no single dominant incident has emerged in the past week to consolidate probabilities. Scheduled appearances or reactions to breaking developments could still alter the field before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Ринок відкрито: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Обсяг
$135,643Дата завершення
Sep 30, 2026Ринок відкрито
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETВирішувач
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Donald Trump's communication style frequently features direct criticisms of political opponents, media personalities, and public figures through rallies, interviews, and social media posts. With the September 30 resolution window now just days away, recent statements and responses to ongoing news cycles in September 2026 have shaped trader views on likely targets. Historical patterns show such remarks often intensify during campaign periods or amid policy disputes, though no single dominant incident has emerged in the past week to consolidate probabilities. Scheduled appearances or reactions to breaking developments could still alter the field before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Обсяг
$135,643Дата завершення
Sep 30, 2026Ринок відкрито
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETВирішувач
0x65070BE91...Donald Trump's communication style frequently features direct criticisms of political opponents, media personalities, and public figures through rallies, interviews, and social media posts. With the September 30 resolution window now just days away, recent statements and responses to ongoing news cycles in September 2026 have shaped trader views on likely targets. Historical patterns show such remarks often intensify during campaign periods or amid policy disputes, though no single dominant incident has emerged in the past week to consolidate probabilities. Scheduled appearances or reactions to breaking developments could still alter the field before the deadline.
Експериментальне резюме, згенероване ШІ з посиланням на дані Polymarket. Це не торгова порада і не впливає на вирішення цього ринку. · Оновлено
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Обережно з зовнішніми посиланнями.
Часті запитання