Anthropic holds a slight edge in the market-implied odds due to its Claude Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 releases, which lead recent intelligence indices and agentic coding benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro. OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 variants deliver strong all-around performance in reasoning and chat, while Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro excels in accuracy, research tasks, and multimodal capabilities. The near-even probabilities across top contenders reflect how specialized strengths—frontier coding, factual grounding, and tool use—create task-dependent leadership rather than a single dominant model. Traders are weighing July 2026 benchmark shifts against the potential for further releases or updates before September 30.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Anthropic 86%
Google 6%
SpaceXAI 4.3%
OpenAI 4.3%

Anthropic
86%

6%

SpaceXAI
4%

OpenAI
4%

字節跳動
4%

DeepSeek
3%

Mistral
3%

Meta
3%

亞馬遜
3%

StepFun
3%

百度
3%

阿里巴巴
2%

騰訊
2%

Nvidia
1%

Moonshot
1%

MiniMax
1%

美團
1%

Z.ai
1%

Thinky
<1%

微軟
<1%

小米
<1%
Anthropic 86%
Google 6%
SpaceXAI 4.3%
OpenAI 4.3%

Anthropic
86%

6%

SpaceXAI
4%

OpenAI
4%

字節跳動
4%

DeepSeek
3%

Mistral
3%

Meta
3%

亞馬遜
3%

StepFun
3%

百度
3%

阿里巴巴
2%

騰訊
2%

Nvidia
1%

Moonshot
1%

MiniMax
1%

美團
1%

Z.ai
1%

Thinky
<1%

微軟
<1%

小米
<1%
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Overall" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/overall-no-style-control with style control off (Adjustments: None) and filtered for "Models" will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Text Arena (Overall). If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Jul 20, 2026, 8:28 PM ET
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Overall" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/overall-no-style-control with style control off (Adjustments: None) and filtered for "Models" will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Text Arena (Overall). If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Anthropic holds a slight edge in the market-implied odds due to its Claude Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 releases, which lead recent intelligence indices and agentic coding benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro. OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 variants deliver strong all-around performance in reasoning and chat, while Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro excels in accuracy, research tasks, and multimodal capabilities. The near-even probabilities across top contenders reflect how specialized strengths—frontier coding, factual grounding, and tool use—create task-dependent leadership rather than a single dominant model. Traders are weighing July 2026 benchmark shifts against the potential for further releases or updates before September 30.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions