Recent developments center on President Trump’s August 27 executive order renaming Lake Ontario “Lake America” during a Canada trade dispute. MapQuest publicly refused to update its maps, posting “We’re not changing it,” which triggered a surge in downloads and App Store rankings while Google Maps and Apple Maps complied. Eric Trump responded with a mocking social-media comment about the company’s longevity, yet Trump himself has issued no direct public statement disparaging Mapquest in the days since. Trader consensus on “No” at 85.5% reflects the absence of any Trump remark meeting the market’s insult criteria through the first days of the resolution window, with his recent communications focused on other domestic and foreign-policy matters. The episode remains too narrow and recent for escalation into a presidential-level response before the September 6 deadline.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於是
20% 機率
最新
最新
2026-09-06
是
20% 機率
最新
最新
2026-09-06
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults Mapquest between market creation and September 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Mapquest includes any parent or subsidiary entity, and any mapquest products. Insults directed only at Mapquest employees or owners will not qualify.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at Mapquest, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at Mapquest within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Mapquest. This includes calling Mapquest a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., the Failing New York Times), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “Mapquest is not good”, “The company has no judgment”). Insults directed at Mapquest’s specific actions, policies, or decisions will qualify (e.g., "Mapquest’s decision not to rename Lake Ontario is stupid"). However, comments that Mapquest should change their policies, without insulting the policy itself, will not qualify (e.g., “Mapquest should update the name to Lake America”).
A statement made in direct reference to Mapquest will qualify even if Mapquest is not explicitly named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Recent developments center on President Trump’s August 27 executive order renaming Lake Ontario “Lake America” during a Canada trade dispute. MapQuest publicly refused to update its maps, posting “We’re not changing it,” which triggered a surge in downloads and App Store rankings while Google Maps and Apple Maps complied. Eric Trump responded with a mocking social-media comment about the company’s longevity, yet Trump himself has issued no direct public statement disparaging Mapquest in the days since. Trader consensus on “No” at 85.5% reflects the absence of any Trump remark meeting the market’s insult criteria through the first days of the resolution window, with his recent communications focused on other domestic and foreign-policy matters. The episode remains too narrow and recent for escalation into a presidential-level response before the September 6 deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults Mapquest between market creation and September 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Mapquest includes any parent or subsidiary entity, and any mapquest products. Insults directed only at Mapquest employees or owners will not qualify.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at Mapquest, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at Mapquest within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Mapquest. This includes calling Mapquest a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., the Failing New York Times), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “Mapquest is not good”, “The company has no judgment”). Insults directed at Mapquest’s specific actions, policies, or decisions will qualify (e.g., "Mapquest’s decision not to rename Lake Ontario is stupid"). However, comments that Mapquest should change their policies, without insulting the policy itself, will not qualify (e.g., “Mapquest should update the name to Lake America”).
A statement made in direct reference to Mapquest will qualify even if Mapquest is not explicitly named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mapquest includes any parent or subsidiary entity, and any mapquest products. Insults directed only at Mapquest employees or owners will not qualify.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at Mapquest, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at Mapquest within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Mapquest. This includes calling Mapquest a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., the Failing New York Times), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “Mapquest is not good”, “The company has no judgment”). Insults directed at Mapquest’s specific actions, policies, or decisions will qualify (e.g., "Mapquest’s decision not to rename Lake Ontario is stupid"). However, comments that Mapquest should change their policies, without insulting the policy itself, will not qualify (e.g., “Mapquest should update the name to Lake America”).
A statement made in direct reference to Mapquest will qualify even if Mapquest is not explicitly named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間： Sep 2, 2026, 11:59 AM ET
交易量
$2,728結束日期
2026-09-07市場開放時間
Sep 2, 2026, 11:59 AM ETThis market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults Mapquest between market creation and September 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Mapquest includes any parent or subsidiary entity, and any mapquest products. Insults directed only at Mapquest employees or owners will not qualify.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at Mapquest, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at Mapquest within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Mapquest. This includes calling Mapquest a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., the Failing New York Times), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “Mapquest is not good”, “The company has no judgment”). Insults directed at Mapquest’s specific actions, policies, or decisions will qualify (e.g., "Mapquest’s decision not to rename Lake Ontario is stupid"). However, comments that Mapquest should change their policies, without insulting the policy itself, will not qualify (e.g., “Mapquest should update the name to Lake America”).
A statement made in direct reference to Mapquest will qualify even if Mapquest is not explicitly named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Recent developments center on President Trump’s August 27 executive order renaming Lake Ontario “Lake America” during a Canada trade dispute. MapQuest publicly refused to update its maps, posting “We’re not changing it,” which triggered a surge in downloads and App Store rankings while Google Maps and Apple Maps complied. Eric Trump responded with a mocking social-media comment about the company’s longevity, yet Trump himself has issued no direct public statement disparaging Mapquest in the days since. Trader consensus on “No” at 85.5% reflects the absence of any Trump remark meeting the market’s insult criteria through the first days of the resolution window, with his recent communications focused on other domestic and foreign-policy matters. The episode remains too narrow and recent for escalation into a presidential-level response before the September 6 deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults Mapquest between market creation and September 6, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Mapquest includes any parent or subsidiary entity, and any mapquest products. Insults directed only at Mapquest employees or owners will not qualify.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at Mapquest, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at Mapquest within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Mapquest. This includes calling Mapquest a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., the Failing New York Times), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “Mapquest is not good”, “The company has no judgment”). Insults directed at Mapquest’s specific actions, policies, or decisions will qualify (e.g., "Mapquest’s decision not to rename Lake Ontario is stupid"). However, comments that Mapquest should change their policies, without insulting the policy itself, will not qualify (e.g., “Mapquest should update the name to Lake America”).
A statement made in direct reference to Mapquest will qualify even if Mapquest is not explicitly named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mapquest includes any parent or subsidiary entity, and any mapquest products. Insults directed only at Mapquest employees or owners will not qualify.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at Mapquest, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at Mapquest within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages Mapquest. This includes calling Mapquest a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., the Failing New York Times), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “Mapquest is not good”, “The company has no judgment”). Insults directed at Mapquest’s specific actions, policies, or decisions will qualify (e.g., "Mapquest’s decision not to rename Lake Ontario is stupid"). However, comments that Mapquest should change their policies, without insulting the policy itself, will not qualify (e.g., “Mapquest should update the name to Lake America”).
A statement made in direct reference to Mapquest will qualify even if Mapquest is not explicitly named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$2,728結束日期
2026-09-07市場開放時間
Sep 2, 2026, 11:59 AM ETRecent developments center on President Trump’s August 27 executive order renaming Lake Ontario “Lake America” during a Canada trade dispute. MapQuest publicly refused to update its maps, posting “We’re not changing it,” which triggered a surge in downloads and App Store rankings while Google Maps and Apple Maps complied. Eric Trump responded with a mocking social-media comment about the company’s longevity, yet Trump himself has issued no direct public statement disparaging Mapquest in the days since. Trader consensus on “No” at 85.5% reflects the absence of any Trump remark meeting the market’s insult criteria through the first days of the resolution window, with his recent communications focused on other domestic and foreign-policy matters. The episode remains too narrow and recent for escalation into a presidential-level response before the September 6 deadline.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions