Traders assign a 99.6% implied probability against Donald Trump issuing a public insult toward Xi Jinping this week, driven by the current pattern of measured bilateral diplomacy and routine public statements between the US and China. Ongoing trade and security dialogues have emphasized negotiation over confrontation, consistent with institutional norms that constrain executive rhetoric during non-crisis periods. No major summits, policy deadlines, or escalatory triggers fall inside the market's resolution window, reducing the scope for spontaneous remarks. Scenarios that could still alter this outcome include an unscheduled personal exchange or abrupt shift in messaging on tariffs or territorial issues, though such developments remain outside established trends in US-China relations.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於特朗普本周是否會侮辱習近平?
是
$311,939 交易量
$311,939 交易量
是
$311,939 交易量
$311,939 交易量
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: May 11, 2026, 4:18 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Traders assign a 99.6% implied probability against Donald Trump issuing a public insult toward Xi Jinping this week, driven by the current pattern of measured bilateral diplomacy and routine public statements between the US and China. Ongoing trade and security dialogues have emphasized negotiation over confrontation, consistent with institutional norms that constrain executive rhetoric during non-crisis periods. No major summits, policy deadlines, or escalatory triggers fall inside the market's resolution window, reducing the scope for spontaneous remarks. Scenarios that could still alter this outcome include an unscheduled personal exchange or abrupt shift in messaging on tariffs or territorial issues, though such developments remain outside established trends in US-China relations.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions