Pro-Trump activists circulated a draft executive order in late February 2026 alleging Chinese interference in the 2020 election as grounds for President Trump to declare a national emergency, aiming to impose federal controls like banning mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump distanced himself on February 28, stating he had "never heard" of the proposal, while Senate Democrats prepared legislation to block any such declaration under the National Emergencies Act. No official action or endorsement has followed amid legal skepticism, institutional opposition, and competing priorities such as other executive orders on border security and trade; traders' 73% "No" consensus reflects these barriers and the absence of recent catalysts in the past six weeks.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于是
$156,458 交易量
$156,458 交易量
2026-12-31
是
$156,458 交易量
$156,458 交易量
2026-12-31
This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Pro-Trump activists circulated a draft executive order in late February 2026 alleging Chinese interference in the 2020 election as grounds for President Trump to declare a national emergency, aiming to impose federal controls like banning mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump distanced himself on February 28, stating he had "never heard" of the proposal, while Senate Democrats prepared legislation to block any such declaration under the National Emergencies Act. No official action or endorsement has followed amid legal skepticism, institutional opposition, and competing priorities such as other executive orders on border security and trade; traders' 73% "No" consensus reflects these barriers and the absence of recent catalysts in the past six weeks.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市场开放时间： Feb 26, 2026, 4:29 PM ET
交易量
$156,458结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Feb 26, 2026, 4:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.Pro-Trump activists circulated a draft executive order in late February 2026 alleging Chinese interference in the 2020 election as grounds for President Trump to declare a national emergency, aiming to impose federal controls like banning mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump distanced himself on February 28, stating he had "never heard" of the proposal, while Senate Democrats prepared legislation to block any such declaration under the National Emergencies Act. No official action or endorsement has followed amid legal skepticism, institutional opposition, and competing priorities such as other executive orders on border security and trade; traders' 73% "No" consensus reflects these barriers and the absence of recent catalysts in the past six weeks.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
交易量
$156,458结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Feb 26, 2026, 4:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Pro-Trump activists circulated a draft executive order in late February 2026 alleging Chinese interference in the 2020 election as grounds for President Trump to declare a national emergency, aiming to impose federal controls like banning mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump distanced himself on February 28, stating he had "never heard" of the proposal, while Senate Democrats prepared legislation to block any such declaration under the National Emergencies Act. No official action or endorsement has followed amid legal skepticism, institutional opposition, and competing priorities such as other executive orders on border security and trade; traders' 73% "No" consensus reflects these barriers and the absence of recent catalysts in the past six weeks.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题