Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party has gained ground in recent polls as a standalone centrist option, at times matching or exceeding the Bennett-Lapid Together slate, reducing incentive for merger ahead of the October 27 Knesset elections. Bennett and Lapid formed their alliance earlier in 2026 and reserved the number-two slot for Eisenkot, with Lapid publicly stating in early June that a formal announcement was weeks away. Eisenkot instead proposed a broader three-way “super-party,” criticized the duo for diluting opposition strength through their bilateral deal, and emphasized a strictly Zionist framework that leaves open limited coordination with Arab parties under strict conditions—positions that diverge from Bennett’s explicit rejection of Arab partners. These polling trends, strategic differences, and unresolved coalition math continue to shape trader assessments of any near-term integration.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于Eisenkot是否会在……之前加入Bennett-Lapid联盟?
$95,134 交易量

2026年8月31日
2%
$95,134 交易量

2026年8月31日
2%
1) The Yashar party ("Yashar! With Eisenkot") or the Together Party announce that the Yashar party will merge with, or contest the 2026 Israeli legislative election on a joint candidate list with, the Together party.
2) Gadi Eisenkot or the Together party announce that Gadi Eisenkot will run on the Together party’s candidate list for the 2026 Israeli legislative election.
Only definitive announcements will qualify. Suggestions, negotiations, offers, invitations, or other non-definitive statements will not count.
If the Together party undergoes a merger, name change, or other restructuring, the resulting party or alliance will be considered the Together party for purposes of this market, provided both Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid are members of the resulting party or alliance.
If the Yashar party undergoes a merger, name change, or other restructuring, the resulting party, alliance, or candidate list will be considered the Yashar party for purposes of this market, provided Gadi Eisenkot is a member of the resulting party, alliance, or candidate list.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the Yashar party, the Together party, Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, and Yair Lapid; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市场开放时间: Jun 28, 2026, 5:52 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...1) The Yashar party ("Yashar! With Eisenkot") or the Together Party announce that the Yashar party will merge with, or contest the 2026 Israeli legislative election on a joint candidate list with, the Together party.
2) Gadi Eisenkot or the Together party announce that Gadi Eisenkot will run on the Together party’s candidate list for the 2026 Israeli legislative election.
Only definitive announcements will qualify. Suggestions, negotiations, offers, invitations, or other non-definitive statements will not count.
If the Together party undergoes a merger, name change, or other restructuring, the resulting party or alliance will be considered the Together party for purposes of this market, provided both Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid are members of the resulting party or alliance.
If the Yashar party undergoes a merger, name change, or other restructuring, the resulting party, alliance, or candidate list will be considered the Yashar party for purposes of this market, provided Gadi Eisenkot is a member of the resulting party, alliance, or candidate list.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the Yashar party, the Together party, Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, and Yair Lapid; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party has gained ground in recent polls as a standalone centrist option, at times matching or exceeding the Bennett-Lapid Together slate, reducing incentive for merger ahead of the October 27 Knesset elections. Bennett and Lapid formed their alliance earlier in 2026 and reserved the number-two slot for Eisenkot, with Lapid publicly stating in early June that a formal announcement was weeks away. Eisenkot instead proposed a broader three-way “super-party,” criticized the duo for diluting opposition strength through their bilateral deal, and emphasized a strictly Zionist framework that leaves open limited coordination with Arab parties under strict conditions—positions that diverge from Bennett’s explicit rejection of Arab partners. These polling trends, strategic differences, and unresolved coalition math continue to shape trader assessments of any near-term integration.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于

警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题