Brazil’s Senate has never removed an STF justice via impeachment despite repeated petitions, including recent ones targeting Alexandre de Moraes and others. A December 2025 ruling by Justice Gilmar Mendes narrowed standing to initiate such proceedings primarily to the Prosecutor-General while raising procedural thresholds, limiting congressional action. Ongoing congressional inquiries, such as the Banco Master CPI report recommending proceedings against several justices, have not advanced past the Senate leadership, which has historically declined to pursue cases. With only months remaining until the 2027 deadline and a two-thirds Senate vote required for conviction on charges of responsibility, trader consensus at 96.6% for “No” reflects these structural barriers and precedent. Realistic shifts could still occur if the incoming Senate composition after 2026 elections prioritizes judicial oversight or if new primary-source evidence prompts rapid floor action, though both face significant institutional and timing constraints.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日はい
$83,546 Vol.
$83,546 Vol.
はい
$83,546 Vol.
$83,546 Vol.
Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
マーケット開始日: Jan 8, 2026, 1:14 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Justices leaving the court due to term limits, voluntary resignation, or any other reason not resulting from impeachment or a trial for a crime of responsibility will not count.
Impeachments, trials for crimes of responsibility, suspensions, or other procedural measures will not alone suffice to resolve this market if they do not result in the permanent removal of a justice from the Brazil Supreme Federal Court.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of Brazil; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Brazil’s Senate has never removed an STF justice via impeachment despite repeated petitions, including recent ones targeting Alexandre de Moraes and others. A December 2025 ruling by Justice Gilmar Mendes narrowed standing to initiate such proceedings primarily to the Prosecutor-General while raising procedural thresholds, limiting congressional action. Ongoing congressional inquiries, such as the Banco Master CPI report recommending proceedings against several justices, have not advanced past the Senate leadership, which has historically declined to pursue cases. With only months remaining until the 2027 deadline and a two-thirds Senate vote required for conviction on charges of responsibility, trader consensus at 96.6% for “No” reflects these structural barriers and precedent. Realistic shifts could still occur if the incoming Senate composition after 2026 elections prioritizes judicial oversight or if new primary-source evidence prompts rapid floor action, though both face significant institutional and timing constraints.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日



外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問