Alibaba holds a narrow lead in trader consensus for third place among Code Arena WebDev AI labs by end of September, reflecting its recent model releases and competitive benchmark results in coding and web development tasks. Multiple contenders sit near even odds, underscoring a fragmented field where Chinese labs such as Moonshot and SpaceXAI trail but remain in contention due to strong performance on specialized code generation metrics. Established players including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic trade at low implied probabilities, consistent with slower iteration cycles or less emphasis on the exact webdev benchmarks driving this market. Key swing factors include any late-September model updates, new capability demonstrations, or third-party evaluations that could shift developer adoption and arena rankings before resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日アリババ 55%
スペースXAI 25.1%
Moonshot 12%
OpenAI 3.3%
$42,864 Vol.
$42,864 Vol.

アリババ
55%

スペースXAI
25%

Moonshot
12%

OpenAI
3%

Z.ai
2%

DeepSeek
1%

1%

ByteDance
1%

MiniMax
1%

Anthropic
1%

シャオミ
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Meta
<1%

テンセント
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Thinky
<1%
アリババ 55%
スペースXAI 25.1%
Moonshot 12%
OpenAI 3.3%
$42,864 Vol.
$42,864 Vol.

アリババ
55%

スペースXAI
25%

Moonshot
12%

OpenAI
3%

Z.ai
2%

DeepSeek
1%

1%

ByteDance
1%

MiniMax
1%

Anthropic
1%

シャオミ
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Meta
<1%

テンセント
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Thinky
<1%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
マーケット開始日: Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ET
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Alibaba holds a narrow lead in trader consensus for third place among Code Arena WebDev AI labs by end of September, reflecting its recent model releases and competitive benchmark results in coding and web development tasks. Multiple contenders sit near even odds, underscoring a fragmented field where Chinese labs such as Moonshot and SpaceXAI trail but remain in contention due to strong performance on specialized code generation metrics. Established players including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic trade at low implied probabilities, consistent with slower iteration cycles or less emphasis on the exact webdev benchmarks driving this market. Key swing factors include any late-September model updates, new capability demonstrations, or third-party evaluations that could shift developer adoption and arena rankings before resolution.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問