Trump's pattern of direct confrontations with journalists has intensified in recent weeks, including his September 18 Oval Office exchange labeling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" and his Truth Social announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House access over coverage disputes. These developments coincide with his public remarks on the Iran conflict, Supreme Court rulings on ballots and tariffs, and preparations for meetings with Gulf leaders at the UN General Assembly. Traders monitor Truth Social activity, scheduled press events, and policy announcements in the final days before the September 30 resolution window, as historical frequency of such statements suggests continued public criticism of media figures or political opponents remains likely.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日$137,850 Vol.
2026/09/30
マーク・カーニー
78%
タッカー・カールソン
68%
ジョン・オソフ
70%
キャシー・ホークル
50%
ゾーラン・マムダニ
30%
アレックス・ジョーンズ
46%
ジミー・キンメル
48%
イーロン・マスク
39%
レティシア・ジェームズ
39%
アレクサンドリア・オカシオ＝コルテス
29%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
27%
マーシャリー・テイラー・グリーン
34%
アンディ・バーナム
33%
キャンディス・オーウェンズ
31%
エマニュエル・マクロン
14%
ジェローム・パウエル
13%
パム・ボンディ
10%
ベンヤミン・ネタニヤフ
10%
ノラ・オドネル
8%
スティーヴン・コルベア
28%
レオ14世教皇
6%
ケビン・ウォーシュ
6%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
4%
J.D.ヴァンス
3%
習近平
3%
カロリン・レビット
3%
メラニア・トランプ
19%
ウラジーミル・プーチン
1%
メーガン・ケリー
42%
イルハン・オマル
56%
ヒラリー・クリントン
52%
エリザベス・ウォーレン
46%
アダム・シフ
42%
$137,850 Vol.
マーク・カーニー
$5,396 Vol.
78%
タッカー・カールソン
$3,227 Vol.
68%
ジョン・オソフ
$123 Vol.
70%
キャシー・ホークル
$2,309 Vol.
50%
ゾーラン・マムダニ
$2,510 Vol.
30%
アレックス・ジョーンズ
$204 Vol.
46%
ジミー・キンメル
$923 Vol.
48%
イーロン・マスク
$170 Vol.
39%
レティシア・ジェームズ
$747 Vol.
39%
アレクサンドリア・オカシオ＝コルテス
$249 Vol.
29%
フリードリヒ・メルツ
$2,496 Vol.
27%
マーシャリー・テイラー・グリーン
$1,525 Vol.
34%
アンディ・バーナム
$3,715 Vol.
33%
キャンディス・オーウェンズ
$3,097 Vol.
31%
エマニュエル・マクロン
$4,523 Vol.
14%
ジェローム・パウエル
$2,136 Vol.
13%
パム・ボンディ
$263 Vol.
10%
ベンヤミン・ネタニヤフ
$1,642 Vol.
10%
ノラ・オドネル
$72 Vol.
8%
スティーヴン・コルベア
$321 Vol.
28%
レオ14世教皇
$1,386 Vol.
6%
ケビン・ウォーシュ
$77,433 Vol.
6%
ムハンマド・ビン・サルマン
$440 Vol.
4%
J.D.ヴァンス
$1,542 Vol.
3%
習近平
$2,189 Vol.
3%
カロリン・レビット
$300 Vol.
3%
メラニア・トランプ
$101 Vol.
19%
ウラジーミル・プーチン
$2,727 Vol.
1%
メーガン・ケリー
$407 Vol.
42%
イルハン・オマル
$419 Vol.
56%
ヒラリー・クリントン
$1,985 Vol.
52%
エリザベス・ウォーレン
$457 Vol.
46%
アダム・シフ
$61 Vol.
42%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's pattern of direct confrontations with journalists has intensified in recent weeks, including his September 18 Oval Office exchange labeling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" and his Truth Social announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House access over coverage disputes. These developments coincide with his public remarks on the Iran conflict, Supreme Court rulings on ballots and tariffs, and preparations for meetings with Gulf leaders at the UN General Assembly. Traders monitor Truth Social activity, scheduled press events, and policy announcements in the final days before the September 30 resolution window, as historical frequency of such statements suggests continued public criticism of media figures or political opponents remains likely.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
音量
$137,850終了日
2026/09/30マーケット開始日
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump's pattern of direct confrontations with journalists has intensified in recent weeks, including his September 18 Oval Office exchange labeling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" and his Truth Social announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House access over coverage disputes. These developments coincide with his public remarks on the Iran conflict, Supreme Court rulings on ballots and tariffs, and preparations for meetings with Gulf leaders at the UN General Assembly. Traders monitor Truth Social activity, scheduled press events, and policy announcements in the final days before the September 30 resolution window, as historical frequency of such statements suggests continued public criticism of media figures or political opponents remains likely.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$137,850終了日
2026/09/30マーケット開始日
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...Trump's pattern of direct confrontations with journalists has intensified in recent weeks, including his September 18 Oval Office exchange labeling a Bloomberg reporter "terrible" and his Truth Social announcement barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House access over coverage disputes. These developments coincide with his public remarks on the Iran conflict, Supreme Court rulings on ballots and tariffs, and preparations for meetings with Gulf leaders at the UN General Assembly. Traders monitor Truth Social activity, scheduled press events, and policy announcements in the final days before the September 30 resolution window, as historical frequency of such statements suggests continued public criticism of media figures or political opponents remains likely.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問