Trump's second term has featured a marked rise in public personal attacks on journalists, political opponents, and other figures, with recent examples including insults directed at NBC's Kristen Welker during a Meet the Press interview and labels like "thug" and "pig" aimed at a Maine Senate candidate. This pattern, amplified by frequent press interactions and campaign-style rhetoric, underpins trader consensus on daily resolution markets for whether he will insult someone on a given date. Scheduled events such as upcoming media appearances, legislative updates, or primary season developments could sustain or briefly interrupt the trend, though historical frequency suggests limited downside risk for Yes outcomes absent major schedule changes.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트$571,517 거래량
6월 18일
91%
6월 25일
92%
6월 27일
91%
6월 14일
100%
6월 15일
92%
6월 16일
92%
6월 17일
91%
6월 19일
92%
6월 20일
93%
6월 21일
92%
6월 22일
93%
6월 23일
93%
6월 24일
94%
6월 26일
94%
6월 28일
93%
6월 29일
92%
6월 30일
93%
$571,517 거래량
6월 18일
91%
6월 25일
92%
6월 27일
91%
6월 14일
100%
6월 15일
92%
6월 16일
92%
6월 17일
91%
6월 19일
92%
6월 20일
93%
6월 21일
92%
6월 22일
93%
6월 23일
93%
6월 24일
94%
6월 26일
94%
6월 28일
93%
6월 29일
92%
6월 30일
93%
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
마켓 개설일: Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trump's second term has featured a marked rise in public personal attacks on journalists, political opponents, and other figures, with recent examples including insults directed at NBC's Kristen Welker during a Meet the Press interview and labels like "thug" and "pig" aimed at a Maine Senate candidate. This pattern, amplified by frequent press interactions and campaign-style rhetoric, underpins trader consensus on daily resolution markets for whether he will insult someone on a given date. Scheduled events such as upcoming media appearances, legislative updates, or primary season developments could sustain or briefly interrupt the trend, though historical frequency suggests limited downside risk for Yes outcomes absent major schedule changes.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
자주 묻는 질문