**Michigan voters face an automatic constitutional convention question on the November 3, 2026 ballot, the fourth such referendum since the 1963 Constitution took effect.** The measure asks whether to convene elected delegates in 2027 for a general revision, with any proposals then submitted to voters for ratification. Historical precedent strongly shapes current trader sentiment, as voters rejected prior calls by wide margins—77% no in 1978, 72% in 1994, and 67% in 2010—reflecting consistent preference for the existing framework over a full rewrite. Organized opposition from education and labor groups, including the Michigan Education Association, has already mobilized against the proposal, citing risks that a convention could reopen debates on public schools, collective bargaining, and other protected provisions. Targeted constitutional amendments via petition or legislative referral remain available as an alternative path for specific changes, further reducing perceived need for a convention. With the question appearing automatically every 16 years and limited recent polling or momentum for approval, trader consensus at 68% for rejection aligns with these established patterns and institutional preferences.