This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 12, and June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 2, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between September 23 and December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between October 8, and March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Ongoing tensions between NATO and Russia remain centered on the proxy conflict in Ukraine, where Moscow continues to commit the bulk of its combat forces while conducting hybrid operations such as airspace incursions and infrastructure sabotage against alliance members. Dutch intelligence assessed in April 2026 that Russia could prepare for limited regional action against NATO within a year after fighting in Ukraine ends, aiming to exploit political divisions rather than seek decisive victory. U.S. officials warned in mid-May 2026 that Moscow would likely rebalance forces northward toward the Baltic states and eastern flank once Ukrainian hostilities conclude, increasing pressure through conventional repositioning and gray-zone tactics. NATO continues large-scale exercises and force enhancements along its eastern border, while recent statements from alliance leaders emphasize readiness for potential challenges as early as 2027. These developments shape trader assessments of escalation risks tied to any Ukraine ceasefire timeline or force redeployments.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 2, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 2, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Ongoing tensions between NATO and Russia remain centered on the proxy conflict in Ukraine, where Moscow continues to commit the bulk of its combat forces while conducting hybrid operations such as airspace incursions and infrastructure sabotage against alliance members. Dutch intelligence assessed in April 2026 that Russia could prepare for limited regional action against NATO within a year after fighting in Ukraine ends, aiming to exploit political divisions rather than seek decisive victory. U.S. officials warned in mid-May 2026 that Moscow would likely rebalance forces northward toward the Baltic states and eastern flank once Ukrainian hostilities conclude, increasing pressure through conventional repositioning and gray-zone tactics. NATO continues large-scale exercises and force enhancements along its eastern border, while recent statements from alliance leaders emphasize readiness for potential challenges as early as 2027. These developments shape trader assessments of escalation risks tied to any Ukraine ceasefire timeline or force redeployments.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
May 10 2026
Latvian Defense Minister resigns after drone airspace violations
Following drone incursions into Latvian airspace and strikes on oil facilities, the Latvian Defense Minister resigned amid criticism of defense sector leadership. This political fallout reflected the seriousness of airspace violations but did not constitute a direct military clash with Russia.
May 7 2026
Latvia reports Russian drones entering its airspace, one crashes near oil facility
December 31 rises to 17%3%
Incursions of Russian drones into a NATO member’s airspace heightened alert but, lacking direct combat, reinforced expectations that clashes would remain limited, sustaining low price levels.
May 7 2026
Russian drones enter Latvian airspace, one crashes near oil facility
December 31 drops to 16%5%
Several drones entered Latvian airspace from Russia, with one crashing near an oil storage facility. Latvian authorities did not shoot down the drones due to safety concerns. This incident heightened tensions but did not meet the market's criteria for a military clash involving use of force between NATO and Russia.
May 2 2026
NATO’s Allied Reaction Force conducts large‑scale exercise Steadfast Dart 2025
The successful large‑scale ARF exercise demonstrated NATO’s readiness without involving direct combat with Russia, reinforcing the view that a NATO‑Russia clash was unlikely and keeping market sentiment low.
Apr 24 2026
Polish Prime Minister questions US loyalty to NATO amid Russia tensions
December 31 dips to 21%1%
Polish PM Donald Tusk publicly questioned the United States' commitment to NATO defense obligations, reflecting alliance unease and concerns over readiness to respond to Russian aggression. This political uncertainty influenced market perceptions of NATO-Russia military clash risk.
Apr 22 2026
Germany unveils plan to build Europe’s strongest army amid Russian threat
December 31 rises to 22%2%
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius announced a comprehensive military strategy to enhance Germany's defensive capabilities and build Europe's strongest conventional army by 2039, citing Russia as the greatest immediate threat. This announcement reflected heightened NATO readiness but did not indicate imminent military conflict, contributing to market reassessment of clash likelihood.
Apr 20 2026
NATO launches Eastern Sentry to bolster eastern flank
December 31 rises to 14%3%
The activation of the Eastern Sentry vigilance activity signaled increased NATO readiness, reducing perceived risk of a direct NATO‑Russia clash and supporting the market’s decline.
Apr 11 2026
Czech President Petr Pavel warns Europe may need to shoot down Russian aircraft violating NATO airspace
Pavel’s warning that Europe might have to down Russian aircraft if violations continue heightened diplomatic pressure on Russia, lowering the perceived chance of a direct NATO‑Russia engagement.
Mar 8 2026
NATO launches Eastern Sentry to bolster vigilance on its eastern flank
The activation of Eastern Sentry, a multi‑domain activity enhancing NATO’s presence along the eastern border, signaled a defensive posture that reduced expectations of a direct NATO‑Russia clash, contributing to a price dip.
Mar 8 2026
Russia launches massive missile‑drone barrage ahead of UAE talks
December 31 rises to 11%3%
A record‑size Russian strike targeting Ukraine’s energy sector, timed before diplomatic talks, heightened regional tension but reinforced that NATO forces were not directly involved, keeping prices low.
Feb 10 2026
Ukrainian energy CEO warns NATO of Russian power‑grid attacks
December 31 dips to 8%2%
Maksym Timchenko’s warning about Russian strikes on energy infrastructure emphasized the broader threat but did not suggest a NATO‑Russia clash, contributing to the market’s bearish trend.
Feb 3 2026
NATO chief Mark Rutte confident allies will deliver $15 billion in US arms for Ukraine in 2026
Rutte’s statement that NATO allies will commit substantial arms to Ukraine suggested a continued focus on supporting Ukraine rather than escalating NATO‑Russia direct conflict, prompting another price decline.
Feb 3 2026
NATO chief Mark Rutte visits Kyiv as Russia launches massive winter strike
December 31 drops to 10%5%
Rutte’s visit underscored NATO solidarity while Russia’s large‑scale missile and drone barrage reinforced that direct NATO‑Russia combat remained unlikely, pushing prices lower.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 12, and June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 2, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between September 23 and December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between October 8, and March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.Ongoing tensions between NATO and Russia remain centered on the proxy conflict in Ukraine, where Moscow continues to commit the bulk of its combat forces while conducting hybrid operations such as airspace incursions and infrastructure sabotage against alliance members. Dutch intelligence assessed in April 2026 that Russia could prepare for limited regional action against NATO within a year after fighting in Ukraine ends, aiming to exploit political divisions rather than seek decisive victory. U.S. officials warned in mid-May 2026 that Moscow would likely rebalance forces northward toward the Baltic states and eastern flank once Ukrainian hostilities conclude, increasing pressure through conventional repositioning and gray-zone tactics. NATO continues large-scale exercises and force enhancements along its eastern border, while recent statements from alliance leaders emphasize readiness for potential challenges as early as 2027. These developments shape trader assessments of escalation risks tied to any Ukraine ceasefire timeline or force redeployments.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 2, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of a NATO country and Russia between January 2, and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between NATO and Russian military forces. Non-violent actions, such as airspace violations, firing of warning shots (such as the June, 2021 Black Sea Confrontations between Russian forces and HMS Defender), or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Interception of missiles or other one-way attack or loitering munitions (e.g. Shahed drones) which are targeting a 3rd party other than the listed countries or their respective forces will not alone qualify. Shooting down UAVs which are not munitions (e.g. MQ-9, Orlan 10, Orion, Bayraktar TB2, etc.) will qualify.
Intentional physical collisions, including aerial interceptions and naval ramming without the direct use of weaponry, such as the 2023 Black Sea incident—where a Russian Su-27 damaged a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone's propeller, leading to its crash— will not qualify regardless of damage.
Military contractors will qualify only if confirmed to be operating under the direct command or coordination of the respective state’s armed forces (e.g. the Battle of Khasham would not qualify).
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Ongoing tensions between NATO and Russia remain centered on the proxy conflict in Ukraine, where Moscow continues to commit the bulk of its combat forces while conducting hybrid operations such as airspace incursions and infrastructure sabotage against alliance members. Dutch intelligence assessed in April 2026 that Russia could prepare for limited regional action against NATO within a year after fighting in Ukraine ends, aiming to exploit political divisions rather than seek decisive victory. U.S. officials warned in mid-May 2026 that Moscow would likely rebalance forces northward toward the Baltic states and eastern flank once Ukrainian hostilities conclude, increasing pressure through conventional repositioning and gray-zone tactics. NATO continues large-scale exercises and force enhancements along its eastern border, while recent statements from alliance leaders emphasize readiness for potential challenges as early as 2027. These developments shape trader assessments of escalation risks tied to any Ukraine ceasefire timeline or force redeployments.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено
May 10 2026
Latvian Defense Minister resigns after drone airspace violations
Following drone incursions into Latvian airspace and strikes on oil facilities, the Latvian Defense Minister resigned amid criticism of defense sector leadership. This political fallout reflected the seriousness of airspace violations but did not constitute a direct military clash with Russia.
May 7 2026
Latvia reports Russian drones entering its airspace, one crashes near oil facility
December 31 rises to 17%3%
Incursions of Russian drones into a NATO member’s airspace heightened alert but, lacking direct combat, reinforced expectations that clashes would remain limited, sustaining low price levels.
May 7 2026
Russian drones enter Latvian airspace, one crashes near oil facility
December 31 drops to 16%5%
Several drones entered Latvian airspace from Russia, with one crashing near an oil storage facility. Latvian authorities did not shoot down the drones due to safety concerns. This incident heightened tensions but did not meet the market's criteria for a military clash involving use of force between NATO and Russia.
May 2 2026
NATO’s Allied Reaction Force conducts large‑scale exercise Steadfast Dart 2025
The successful large‑scale ARF exercise demonstrated NATO’s readiness without involving direct combat with Russia, reinforcing the view that a NATO‑Russia clash was unlikely and keeping market sentiment low.
Apr 24 2026
Polish Prime Minister questions US loyalty to NATO amid Russia tensions
December 31 dips to 21%1%
Polish PM Donald Tusk publicly questioned the United States' commitment to NATO defense obligations, reflecting alliance unease and concerns over readiness to respond to Russian aggression. This political uncertainty influenced market perceptions of NATO-Russia military clash risk.
Apr 22 2026
Germany unveils plan to build Europe’s strongest army amid Russian threat
December 31 rises to 22%2%
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius announced a comprehensive military strategy to enhance Germany's defensive capabilities and build Europe's strongest conventional army by 2039, citing Russia as the greatest immediate threat. This announcement reflected heightened NATO readiness but did not indicate imminent military conflict, contributing to market reassessment of clash likelihood.
Apr 20 2026
NATO launches Eastern Sentry to bolster eastern flank
December 31 rises to 14%3%
The activation of the Eastern Sentry vigilance activity signaled increased NATO readiness, reducing perceived risk of a direct NATO‑Russia clash and supporting the market’s decline.
Apr 11 2026
Czech President Petr Pavel warns Europe may need to shoot down Russian aircraft violating NATO airspace
Pavel’s warning that Europe might have to down Russian aircraft if violations continue heightened diplomatic pressure on Russia, lowering the perceived chance of a direct NATO‑Russia engagement.
Mar 8 2026
NATO launches Eastern Sentry to bolster vigilance on its eastern flank
The activation of Eastern Sentry, a multi‑domain activity enhancing NATO’s presence along the eastern border, signaled a defensive posture that reduced expectations of a direct NATO‑Russia clash, contributing to a price dip.
Mar 8 2026
Russia launches massive missile‑drone barrage ahead of UAE talks
December 31 rises to 11%3%
A record‑size Russian strike targeting Ukraine’s energy sector, timed before diplomatic talks, heightened regional tension but reinforced that NATO forces were not directly involved, keeping prices low.
Feb 10 2026
Ukrainian energy CEO warns NATO of Russian power‑grid attacks
December 31 dips to 8%2%
Maksym Timchenko’s warning about Russian strikes on energy infrastructure emphasized the broader threat but did not suggest a NATO‑Russia clash, contributing to the market’s bearish trend.
Feb 3 2026
NATO chief Mark Rutte confident allies will deliver $15 billion in US arms for Ukraine in 2026
Rutte’s statement that NATO allies will commit substantial arms to Ukraine suggested a continued focus on supporting Ukraine rather than escalating NATO‑Russia direct conflict, prompting another price decline.
Feb 3 2026
NATO chief Mark Rutte visits Kyiv as Russia launches massive winter strike
December 31 drops to 10%5%
Rutte’s visit underscored NATO solidarity while Russia’s large‑scale missile and drone barrage reinforced that direct NATO‑Russia combat remained unlikely, pushing prices lower.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы
«Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» — это рынок прогнозов на Polymarket с 4 возможными исходами, где трейдеры покупают и продают акции на основе своих прогнозов. Текущий лидирующий исход — «31 декабря» с 20%, за ним следует «30 июня» с 3%. Цены отражают вероятности сообщества в реальном времени. Например, акция по цене 20¢ означает, что рынок коллективно оценивает вероятность этого исхода в 20%. Эти коэффициенты постоянно меняются. Акции правильного исхода можно обменять на $1 каждую при разрешении рынка.
На сегодняшний день «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» сгенерировал общий объём торгов $1.9 million с момента запуска рынка Sep 23, 2025. Такой уровень активности отражает высокую вовлечённость сообщества Polymarket и гарантирует, что текущие коэффициенты формируются широким кругом участников рынка. Ты можешь отслеживать движение цен в реальном времени и торговать любым исходом прямо на этой странице.
Чтобы торговать на «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?», просмотри 4 доступных исходов на этой странице. Каждый исход показывает текущую цену, представляющую подразумеваемую вероятность рынка. Чтобы занять позицию, выбери исход, который считаешь наиболее вероятным, выбери «Да» для торговли в его пользу или «Нет» для торговли против, введи сумму и нажми «Торговать». Если твой выбранный исход окажется верным, твои акции «Да» принесут $1 каждая. Если нет — $0. Ты также можешь продать акции до разрешения.
Текущий фаворит для «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» — «31 декабря» с 20%, что означает, что рынок оценивает вероятность этого исхода в 20%. Следующий ближайший исход — «30 июня» с 3%. Эти коэффициенты обновляются в реальном времени по мере покупки и продажи акций. Заходи чаще или добавь страницу в закладки.
Правила разрешения «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» точно определяют, что должно произойти, чтобы каждый исход был объявлен победителем, включая официальные источники данных, используемые для определения результата. Ты можешь просмотреть полные критерии разрешения в разделе «Правила» на этой странице над комментариями. Мы рекомендуем внимательно прочитать правила перед торговлей, так как они определяют точные условия, особые случаи и источники.
Да. Тебе не нужно торговать, чтобы оставаться в курсе. Эта страница служит трекером в реальном времени для «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?». Вероятности исходов обновляются в реальном времени по мере поступления новых сделок. Ты можешь добавить эту страницу в закладки и читать раздел комментариев, чтобы узнать мнение других трейдеров. Ты также можешь использовать фильтры временного диапазона на графике, чтобы увидеть, как менялись коэффициенты со временем.
Коэффициенты Polymarket устанавливаются реальными трейдерами, вкладывающими реальные деньги в свои убеждения, что обычно приводит к точным прогнозам. С объёмом торгов $1.9 million по “Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?” эти цены агрегируют коллективные знания и убеждённость тысяч участников — часто превосходя опросы, экспертные прогнозы и традиционные исследования. Рынки прогнозов, такие как Polymarket, имеют сильный послужной список точности, особенно когда события приближаются к дате разрешения. Например, месячный показатель точности Polymarket составляет 94%. Для получения последних статистических данных о точности прогнозов Polymarket посети страницу точности на Polymarket.
Чтобы совершить первую сделку на «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?», зарегистрируй бесплатный аккаунт на Polymarket и пополни его с помощью криптовалюты, кредитной или дебетовой карты или банковского перевода. После пополнения аккаунта вернись на эту страницу, выбери исход, на который хочешь торговать, введи сумму и нажми «Торговать». Если ты новичок на рынках прогнозов, нажми на ссылку «Как это работает» вверху любой страницы Polymarket для пошагового руководства.
На Polymarket цена каждого исхода представляет подразумеваемую вероятность рынка. Цена 20¢ для «31 декабря» на рынке «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» означает, что трейдеры коллективно оценивают вероятность того, что «31 декабря» будет правильным результатом, примерно в 20%. Если ты купишь акции «Да» по 20¢ и исход окажется правильным, ты получишь $1,00 за акцию — прибыль 80¢ за акцию. Если нет — эти акции будут стоить $0.
Рынок «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» запланирован к разрешению примерно Dec 31, 2026. Это означает, что торговля остаётся открытой, а коэффициенты продолжат меняться до этой даты. Точные сроки разрешения зависят от момента появления официального результата, как описано в разделе «Правила».
Рынок «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?» имеет активное сообщество из 38 комментариев, где трейдеры делятся своим анализом, обсуждают исходы и последние события. Прокрути вниз до раздела комментариев, чтобы прочитать, что думают другие участники. Ты также можешь фильтровать по «Топ-держателям» или проверить вкладку «Активность» для ленты сделок в реальном времени.
Polymarket — крупнейший в мире рынок прогнозов, где ты можешь оставаться в курсе событий и зарабатывать на своих знаниях о реальных событиях. Трейдеры покупают и продают акции на исходы по темам от политики и выборов до криптовалют, финансов, спорта, технологий и культуры, включая рынки вроде «Военное столкновение НАТО и России...?». Цены отражают вероятности в реальном времени, подкреплённые финансовыми убеждениями, зачастую обеспечивая более быстрые и точные сигналы, чем опросы, эксперты или традиционные исследования.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы