Trump’s documented pattern of directing personal attacks via Truth Social, rallies, and press encounters continues to shape trader assessments for this market. As of mid-September 2026, recent examples include his September 18 post labeling administration leakers “dirty dogs” amid ongoing Iran conflict reporting, plus earlier remarks questioning Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and calling ABC’s Rachel Scott “the worst.” These incidents align with his frequent criticism of journalists, especially on policy questions, and internal dissent. With the September 30 cutoff approaching, attention centers on scheduled public appearances, potential escalation in foreign policy messaging, and any fresh media scrutiny that could prompt additional named remarks before resolution.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado$131,995 Vol.
30 sep 2026
Mark Carney
79%
Tucker Carlson
71%
Norah O'Donnell
51%
Letitia James
33%
Kathy Hochul
43%
Elon Musk
42%
Jon Ossoff
40%
Ilhan Omar
42%
Zohran Mamdani
31%
Jimmy Kimmel
32%
Elizabeth Warren
31%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
45%
Friedrich Merz
25%
Jerome Powell
22%
Andy Burnham
20%
Emmanuel Macron
18%
Benjamin Netanyahu
9%
Kevin Warsh
8%
Xi Jinping
7%
Stephen Colbert
28%
Mohammed bin Salman
6%
Papa León XIV
6%
Vladimir Putin
3%
Karoline Leavitt
2%
J.D. Vance
16%
Pam Bondi
1%
Alex Jones
15%
Megyn Kelly
46%
Candace Owens
47%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
54%
Melania Trump
33%
Hillary Clinton
59%
Adam Schiff
52%
$131,995 Vol.
Mark Carney
$4,439 Vol.
79%
Tucker Carlson
$2,796 Vol.
71%
Norah O'Donnell
$52 Vol.
51%
Letitia James
$662 Vol.
33%
Kathy Hochul
$2,172 Vol.
43%
Elon Musk
$113 Vol.
42%
Jon Ossoff
$103 Vol.
40%
Ilhan Omar
$419 Vol.
42%
Zohran Mamdani
$2,497 Vol.
31%
Jimmy Kimmel
$913 Vol.
32%
Elizabeth Warren
$457 Vol.
31%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
$235 Vol.
45%
Friedrich Merz
$2,157 Vol.
25%
Jerome Powell
$1,799 Vol.
22%
Andy Burnham
$3,496 Vol.
20%
Emmanuel Macron
$4,403 Vol.
18%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$1,636 Vol.
9%
Kevin Warsh
$74,788 Vol.
8%
Xi Jinping
$1,963 Vol.
7%
Stephen Colbert
$321 Vol.
28%
Mohammed bin Salman
$440 Vol.
6%
Papa León XIV
$1,386 Vol.
6%
Vladimir Putin
$2,642 Vol.
3%
Karoline Leavitt
$300 Vol.
2%
J.D. Vance
$1,507 Vol.
16%
Pam Bondi
$258 Vol.
1%
Alex Jones
$204 Vol.
15%
Megyn Kelly
$397 Vol.
46%
Candace Owens
$3,037 Vol.
47%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$1,515 Vol.
54%
Melania Trump
$95 Vol.
33%
Hillary Clinton
$1,980 Vol.
59%
Adam Schiff
$61 Vol.
52%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s documented pattern of directing personal attacks via Truth Social, rallies, and press encounters continues to shape trader assessments for this market. As of mid-September 2026, recent examples include his September 18 post labeling administration leakers “dirty dogs” amid ongoing Iran conflict reporting, plus earlier remarks questioning Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and calling ABC’s Rachel Scott “the worst.” These incidents align with his frequent criticism of journalists, especially on policy questions, and internal dissent. With the September 30 cutoff approaching, attention centers on scheduled public appearances, potential escalation in foreign policy messaging, and any fresh media scrutiny that could prompt additional named remarks before resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ET
Volumen
$131,995Fecha de finalización
30 sep 2026Mercado abierto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump’s documented pattern of directing personal attacks via Truth Social, rallies, and press encounters continues to shape trader assessments for this market. As of mid-September 2026, recent examples include his September 18 post labeling administration leakers “dirty dogs” amid ongoing Iran conflict reporting, plus earlier remarks questioning Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and calling ABC’s Rachel Scott “the worst.” These incidents align with his frequent criticism of journalists, especially on policy questions, and internal dissent. With the September 30 cutoff approaching, attention centers on scheduled public appearances, potential escalation in foreign policy messaging, and any fresh media scrutiny that could prompt additional named remarks before resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify.
A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$131,995Fecha de finalización
30 sep 2026Mercado abierto
Sep 2, 2026, 5:15 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump’s documented pattern of directing personal attacks via Truth Social, rallies, and press encounters continues to shape trader assessments for this market. As of mid-September 2026, recent examples include his September 18 post labeling administration leakers “dirty dogs” amid ongoing Iran conflict reporting, plus earlier remarks questioning Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s appearance and calling ABC’s Rachel Scott “the worst.” These incidents align with his frequent criticism of journalists, especially on policy questions, and internal dissent. With the September 30 cutoff approaching, attention centers on scheduled public appearances, potential escalation in foreign policy messaging, and any fresh media scrutiny that could prompt additional named remarks before resolution.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes