President Donald Trump’s established pattern of public name-calling through Truth Social posts, interviews, and speeches continues to shape trader assessments in daily markets on whether he will issue a public insult on a given date. Recent examples include his detailed explanation of the term “Dumocrats” for Democrats during a Fox News appearance, references to a reporter as “dumb” while defending White House ballroom plans, and prior rebukes of figures such as Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and media personalities. These statements, alongside ongoing commentary on Iran policy and domestic opponents, reflect a consistent rhetorical style that traders view as likely to recur absent major schedule changes. Upcoming press briefings and potential campaign events could provide additional platforms for such language before market resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於$509,115 交易量
2026-05-31
May 18
95%
May 19
93%
May 20
91%
May 21
90%
May 22
93%
May 23
91%
May 24
90%
May 25
91%
May 26
91%
May 27
89%
May 28
91%
May 29
91%
May 30
91%
May 31
90%
$509,115 交易量
May 18
$7,892 交易量
95%
May 19
$1,979 交易量
93%
May 20
$1,797 交易量
91%
May 21
$748 交易量
90%
May 22
$1,083 交易量
93%
May 23
$153 交易量
91%
May 24
$497 交易量
90%
May 25
$626 交易量
91%
May 26
$735 交易量
91%
May 27
$1,035 交易量
89%
May 28
$523 交易量
91%
May 29
$383 交易量
91%
May 30
$97 交易量
91%
May 31
$399 交易量
90%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s established pattern of public name-calling through Truth Social posts, interviews, and speeches continues to shape trader assessments in daily markets on whether he will issue a public insult on a given date. Recent examples include his detailed explanation of the term “Dumocrats” for Democrats during a Fox News appearance, references to a reporter as “dumb” while defending White House ballroom plans, and prior rebukes of figures such as Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and media personalities. These statements, alongside ongoing commentary on Iran policy and domestic opponents, reflect a consistent rhetorical style that traders view as likely to recur absent major schedule changes. Upcoming press briefings and potential campaign events could provide additional platforms for such language before market resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間： Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
交易量
$509,115結束日期
2026-05-31市場開放時間
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...已提議結果: Yes
無爭議
最終結果: Yes
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump’s established pattern of public name-calling through Truth Social posts, interviews, and speeches continues to shape trader assessments in daily markets on whether he will issue a public insult on a given date. Recent examples include his detailed explanation of the term “Dumocrats” for Democrats during a Fox News appearance, references to a reporter as “dumb” while defending White House ballroom plans, and prior rebukes of figures such as Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and media personalities. These statements, alongside ongoing commentary on Iran policy and domestic opponents, reflect a consistent rhetorical style that traders view as likely to recur absent major schedule changes. Upcoming press briefings and potential campaign events could provide additional platforms for such language before market resolution.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$509,115結束日期
2026-05-31市場開放時間
Apr 30, 2026, 11:29 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...已提議結果: Yes
無爭議
最終結果: Yes
President Donald Trump’s established pattern of public name-calling through Truth Social posts, interviews, and speeches continues to shape trader assessments in daily markets on whether he will issue a public insult on a given date. Recent examples include his detailed explanation of the term “Dumocrats” for Democrats during a Fox News appearance, references to a reporter as “dumb” while defending White House ballroom plans, and prior rebukes of figures such as Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and media personalities. These statements, alongside ongoing commentary on Iran policy and domestic opponents, reflect a consistent rhetorical style that traders view as likely to recur absent major schedule changes. Upcoming press briefings and potential campaign events could provide additional platforms for such language before market resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議，也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions