President Donald Trump's established pattern of direct, personal rhetoric in public statements, Truth Social posts, and media interactions continues to drive trader consensus toward high implied probabilities for daily insult markets. Recent examples include pointed criticisms of journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Kristen Welker, as well as Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, using terms like "thug," "pig," "crooked," and "stupid." Ongoing developments around Iran peace negotiations, including potential deal signings and related diplomatic activity, alongside scheduled appearances, provide frequent platforms for unscripted remarks. This track record, combined with routine media scrutiny, shapes the current positioning ahead of near-term resolution windows.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$594,952 交易量
2026-06-30
6月18日
90%
6月25日
92%
6月27日
91%
6月15日
93%
6月16日
92%
6月17日
93%
6月19日
93%
6月20日
93%
6月21日
92%
6月22日
93%
6月23日
93%
6月24日
94%
6月26日
93%
6月28日
93%
6月29日
92%
6月30日
93%
$594,952 交易量
6月18日
$3,386 交易量
90%
6月25日
$347 交易量
92%
6月27日
$360 交易量
91%
6月15日
$9,392 交易量
93%
6月16日
$1,302 交易量
92%
6月17日
$1,584 交易量
93%
6月19日
$418 交易量
93%
6月20日
$278 交易量
93%
6月21日
$2,816 交易量
92%
6月22日
$390 交易量
93%
6月23日
$390 交易量
93%
6月24日
$243 交易量
94%
6月26日
$220 交易量
93%
6月28日
$859 交易量
93%
6月29日
$1,445 交易量
92%
6月30日
$237 交易量
93%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump's established pattern of direct, personal rhetoric in public statements, Truth Social posts, and media interactions continues to drive trader consensus toward high implied probabilities for daily insult markets. Recent examples include pointed criticisms of journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Kristen Welker, as well as Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, using terms like "thug," "pig," "crooked," and "stupid." Ongoing developments around Iran peace negotiations, including potential deal signings and related diplomatic activity, alongside scheduled appearances, provide frequent platforms for unscripted remarks. This track record, combined with routine media scrutiny, shapes the current positioning ahead of near-term resolution windows.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ET
交易量
$594,952结束日期
2026-06-30市场开放时间
Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Donald Trump's established pattern of direct, personal rhetoric in public statements, Truth Social posts, and media interactions continues to drive trader consensus toward high implied probabilities for daily insult markets. Recent examples include pointed criticisms of journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Kristen Welker, as well as Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, using terms like "thug," "pig," "crooked," and "stupid." Ongoing developments around Iran peace negotiations, including potential deal signings and related diplomatic activity, alongside scheduled appearances, provide frequent platforms for unscripted remarks. This track record, combined with routine media scrutiny, shapes the current positioning ahead of near-term resolution windows.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$594,952结束日期
2026-06-30市场开放时间
Jun 1, 2026, 1:46 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Donald Trump's established pattern of direct, personal rhetoric in public statements, Truth Social posts, and media interactions continues to drive trader consensus toward high implied probabilities for daily insult markets. Recent examples include pointed criticisms of journalists such as Kaitlan Collins and Kristen Welker, as well as Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, using terms like "thug," "pig," "crooked," and "stupid." Ongoing developments around Iran peace negotiations, including potential deal signings and related diplomatic activity, alongside scheduled appearances, provide frequent platforms for unscripted remarks. This track record, combined with routine media scrutiny, shapes the current positioning ahead of near-term resolution windows.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题